THE FREEDOM FIGHTER, July 4, 2016.
The unanimous Declaration of the fifty united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these States; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the New World Order is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over the earth. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
His Congress has passed unconstitutional Laws.
He has passed other Laws for the financial accommodation of large districts of people at the expense of the taxpayers, causing those people to relinquish their Constitutional Rights, Rights inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has declared legislative bodies to be in recess and made appointments in order to circumvent congressional vetting for his candidates, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has taken office of a foreign government, in violation of Article I, Section 9, Clause 8, the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has passed Laws that will allow him to kill Americans for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has endeavoured to conquer the population of these States; for that purpose ignoring and corrupting the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; encouraging illegal migrations hither.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by allowing Loretta Lynch to ignore his malfeasance.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For abolishing the free System of the United States Constitution, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into this country:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our New World Order brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their stealth to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them that we are not their chattel. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
Therefore, We, the People of the united States of America, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these States, solemnly publish and declare, That these United States are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the New World Order, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, the Rothschild family, and the New World Order is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
- The Declaration Of Independence (businessinsider.com)
Live the way you want to. Just don’t hurt me. Live the way you want to. Let’s be free. – The Grouch
January 16, 1919 the 18th amendment was added to the Constitution. It outlawed the manufacture, buying, selling, import or export of alcohol in, into, or out of, the land of the free, The United States of America. It wasn’t illegal to drink it, but if you wanted it; from where would you get it?
Many unattractive women withheld sex from their husbands, coercing them to vote for prohibition. Women’s suffrage was a year away.
Lucky for you alcohol loving readers; the 18th amendment was repealed in 1933. Dire luck for you sinful, hedonistic heathens; the Prohibition Party is alive and well. The party is against gun control, public sector unions, Obamacare, illegal aliens, gay marriage, federal control of education, gambling, pornography, drugs, tobacco, and of course – alcohol.
Sounds good, but I don’t believe the Government should be involved in some moral issues.
I long for a Conservative/Libertarian Utopia. I agree with the Prohibition Party’s views, but I fear they would outlaw some things that should be left to the States and Individuals to decide for themselves.
The Government has no business forcing us to be good people.
And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them. – Luke 9:5
Why do we ban substances?
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. – Genesis 1:12
If an adult cannot decide for himself, what substances he will put on or inside his own body; can he truly be considered free?
Hearken unto me every one of you, and understand: There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him: but the things which come out of him, those are they that defile the man. If any man have ears to hear, let him hear. – Mark 7:14-16
Why don’t we ban some things that really matter; the things that really do hurt innocent people?
While you are celebrating the anniversary of the repeal of prohibition today; don’t forget that we still can’t use cash in Louisiana, raw milk and cheese are illegal, chickens are illegal in Phoenix, gardens are illegal in Tulsa, the U.N. is working on controlling the internets, confiscating our guns, and taxing the very air we breathe. Many schools won’t allow you to pack your children’s lunches, and many states disallow giving birth to children at home.
It’s a good thing alcohol is legal because thinking about all this tyranny could drive a man to drink.
From Fox News:
June 28 in Washington, in the final moments of a very serious, potentially fatal game between the Obama Administration and the People of the United States, a controversial call by replacement judges awarded an unconstitutional law (Obamacare) to the Obama Administration.
After what we saw, I think that many fans all over America are sleepless. Fans are worried and disappointed with the country they love.
I don’t blame them.
They deserve better. The fans watch the congress, they follow their parties, pay their taxes, and they don’t like what they are seeing.
Regular, patriotic judges are involved in a labor dispute with the NWO and are locked out.
There have been a number of controversies surrounding officiating in all freedom and liberty matters over the years, and it becomes part of the legend of the Republic. In the USA, “2012 NDAA,” “H.R. 347,” and “The Federal Reserve Act,” are all etched in the minds of liberty fans. How long of a life Thursday’s episode will have remains to be seen. My guess is that this too shall pass.
But the fact of the matter is, it should have never happened. The league said as much Friday in their press release which stated laws offensive to the Constitution of the United States should have been called, therefore ending the game.
Why is the USA League hiring incompetent judges? Where were they adjudicating before? Small claims court? Traffic court? I heard one sat on the bench of some juvenile court where his biggest case was some kid who broke the window in front of the grocery store.
I heard one of the officials uses the rule book of a different league and probably doesn’t even know our league’s rules.
The replacement officials on the bench are doing their best, but this is not what they do, and they are overmatched by the authority of the NWO, the antiquated rule book, and lack of integrity.
But the officials are not the game. Not to diminish them, but to be fair, everyone knows who Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham are. No one in this country can name all the current Supreme Court justices.
A few days ago I read the USA citizens association letter to the Obama Administration, which stated that there is, ” a deterioration of order, safety, and integrity to the Constitution.” While it deals in much rhetoric, the element of integrity is what is most important.
The integrity of the Constitution is sacrosanct. It is the pillar of what makes the Republic legitimate. That’s why there are so many rules in place that insure that the games are honest and fair. The second that the public thinks the games are not, is the moment that the fascination that people have with the USA will end.
I also heard Alex Jones, the head of the Liberty Movement, talking in an interview about how awful things are regarding this NWO lockout. He may be right. He also has the power to do something about it.
perhaps what happened in Washington will open the eyes on each side that damage is being done to the Country we all love.
All concerned should keep one thing in the forefront of their minds: the fans deserve better. Everyone needs to take a step back, and end this self inflicted wound.
- White House demands military prisons for Americans under NDAA (EndtheLie.com)
- Obama wins right to indefinitely detain Americans under NDAA (hangthebankers.com)
Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, suggests the Egyptians, while forming their new constitution, should look for inspiration in South Africa’s constitution, not America’s.
“Egyptians should be aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II… I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa… That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.” – Ruth Bader Ginsburg
She thinks the Constitution is too old. The pot calling the kettle black. If the Constitution is too old; then she is too old for her job. I’m surprised she stayed awake long enough to do the interview. I’ve only seen her nodding off at State of the Union Addresses like an old person at church.
She’s not the only one that has a problem with the Constitution. Our Constitution has too many negative rights according to the President of the United States.
“If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.” – Barack Obama
Didn’t these people take an oath to uphold the Constitution?
What’s so good about South Africa’s constitution?
Their preamble states:
We therefore, through our freely elected representatives, adopt this Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic
One must dig in all the way to article VI of the U.S. Constitution to read:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in…shall be the supreme Law of the Land…
Blah blah this, Olde English words that… The supremacy of the Constitution is at the end of the document and not written in understandable plain English.
No wonder it gets laughed at and trampled on. So many people today have ADD and won’t read that far into an archaic document. Our legislators routinely pass laws they haven’t read.
South Africa constitution:
12. Freedom and security of the person
2.Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right
a. to make decisions concerning reproduction;
b. to security in and control over their body…
Read between the lines: Abortions for women of any age, at any stage of pregnancy, for any reason whatsoever, free of charge.
No person shall be…deprived of life…without due process of law…
The Founding Fathers had a respect for life. Ginsburg and Obama want to murder babies, and they want our tax money to pay for it.
South Africa constitution:
15. Freedom of religion, belief and opinion
1.Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.
1. Religious observances may be conducted at state or state-aided institutions, provided that
a.those observances follow rules made by the appropriate public authorities;
they are conducted on an equitable basis; and
b. attendance at them is free and voluntary.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…
Who says, thereof? It’s too hard to understand. Many people today believe this means separation of church and state. They think this means prayer isn’t allowed in school or the Ten Commandments can’t be displayed at a courthouse. South Africa’s constitution is clear. Franklin Graham can speak at the Pentagon as long as the event is equitable, free and voluntary.
South Africa Constitution:
a.This section does not prevent legislation recognising
i. marriages concluded under any tradition, or a system of religious, personal or family law; or
ii. systems of personal and family law under any tradition, or adhered to by persons professing a particular religion.
Does this law allow gay marriage? It appears to, if, gay marriage is traditional, or a system of religious, personal, or family law. If the couple can profess to be a part of a gay religion; it looks like they can marry in South Africa.
Gay South Africans: Let me know how that works out for you.
Section 1. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of…liberty…without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section. 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State…
Section. 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States…
The Constitution doesn’t mention marriage, but if any combination of people, animals or objects manages to get a pastor to perform the service and obtain a marriage license; the Government is compelled to recognize it.
South Africa Constitution:
No citizen may be deprived of citizenship.
Section 1. All Persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Who says words like, wherein? Like I said before; the language is too hard to understand. People that don’t read anyway aren’t going to read the whole Constitution and then the Amendments too. Amendment XIV is halfway through the Amendment section. I don’t believe Joe Lieberman and Charles Dent are aware of Amendment XIV. If so; would they have written the Enemy Expatriation Act?
South Africa Constitution:
21. Freedom of movement and residence
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There is nothing wrong with our Constitution. We only need to read it. Was Amendment IV read by those who created the TSA and allowed them to keep a woman off a flight because there were no female agents there to feel her up?
South Africa Constitution:
27. Health care, food, water and social security
1. Everyone has the right to have access to
a. health care services, including reproductive health care;
b. sufficient food and water; and
c. social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependants, appropriate social assistance.
2. The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.
Read between the lines:
Free. Cradle to Grave government support of every aspect of personal life.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg took an oath to uphold the United States’ Constitution, but she seems to be showing loyalty to Canada’s and South Africa’s. She lauds South Africa’s constitution because it contains so many Human Rights. The truth is; much of it and all the post WWII constitutions are based on ours.
South Africa’s constitution says that housing, health care, food, water, social security, and education are rights.
The Declaration of Independence states:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…
Rights are given to us by God, not Man. A man can take away your rights, but he cannot give them to you. A right is not something that another man can give you. How can a man give you life? How can a man make you happy?
South Africans, while you’re enjoying all the free stuff you have a “right” to; remember this:
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.” – Gerald Ford
Elections have consequences. Ginsburg was appointed by Bill Clinton. I’m glad I didn’t fall for his “cool” act; playing sax on Arsenio Hall and serial marital infidelities. Now we have Obama and Obamacare. The legality of the ACA is going to be decided by Ginsburg and the Supreme Court.
Is she going to go with South Africa and say that health care is a right, even though to receive it, it must be taken from someone else, or will her decision be guided by the Constitution she swore to uphold?