SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer! Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. – Common Sense
Why does anyone care anything about these people? Instead of mobs with torches and pitchforks; these murderous, in-bred, psychopaths get your adoration.
I’m sure most of the 750 million people who watched Charles’ and Diana’s wedding are divorced now. How many of you can have your ex-wife publicly murdered and get away with it? How many dead bodies can be found at your house before you get sent to prison?
I know it is difficult to get over local or long standing prejudices, yet if we will suffer ourselves to examine the component parts of the English constitution, we shall find them to be the base remains of two ancient tyrannies, compounded with some new republican materials.
First.- The remains of monarchical tyranny in the person of the king.
…The two first, by being hereditary, are independent of the people; wherefore in a constitutional sense they contribute nothing towards the freedom of the state.
…There is something exceedingly ridiculous in the composition of monarchy
…How came the king by a power which the people are afraid to trust, and always obliged to check? Such a power could not be the gift of a wise people, neither can any power, which needs checking, be from God
…though we have and wise enough to shut and lock a door against absolute monarchy, we at the same time have been foolish enough to put the crown in possession of the key.
…The prejudice of Englishmen, in favor of their own government by king, lords, and commons, arises as much or more from national pride than reason.
…MANKIND being originally equals in the order of creation, the equality could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance
…the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad the distinctions of heaven; but how a race of men came into the world so exalted above the rest, and distinguished like some new species, is worth enquiring into, and whether they are the means of happiness or of misery to mankind.
…Government by kings was first introduced into the world by the Heathens, from whom the children of Israel copied the custom. It was the most prosperous invention the Devil ever set on foot for the promotion of idolatry. The Heathens paid divine honors to their deceased kings, and the Christian world hath improved on the plan by doing the same to their living ones. How impious is the title of sacred majesty applied to a worm, who in the midst of his splendor is crumbling into dust!
As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture; for the will of the Almighty, as declared by Gideon and the prophet Samuel, expressly disapproves of government by kings.
Monarchy is ranked in scripture as one of the sins of the Jews, for which a curse in reserve is denounced against them. The history of that transaction is worth attending to.
…it unanswerably follows that original sin and hereditary succession are parallels. Dishonorable rank! Inglorious connection! Yet the most subtle sophist cannot produce a juster simile.
…To the evil of monarchy we have added that of hereditary succession; and as the first is a degradation and lessening of ourselves, so the second, claimed as a matter of right, is an insult and an imposition on posterity. For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others for ever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honors of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings, is, that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.
Secondly, as no man at first could possess any other public honors than were bestowed upon him, so the givers of those honors could have no power to give away the right of posterity, and though they might say, “We choose you for our head,” they could not, without manifest injustice to their children, say, “that your children and your children’s children shall reign over ours for ever.” Because such an unwise, unjust, unnatural compact might (perhaps) in the next succession put them under the government of a rogue or a fool. Most wise men, in their private sentiments, have ever treated hereditary right with contempt; yet it is one of those evils, which when once established is not easily removed; many submit from fear, others from superstition, and the more powerful part shares with the king the plunder of the rest.
This is supposing the present race of kings in the world to have had an honorable origin
…England, since the conquest, hath known some few good monarchs, but groaned beneath a much larger number of bad ones
… But it is not so much the absurdity as the evil of hereditary succession which concerns mankind. Did it ensure a race of good and wise men it would have the seal of divine authority, but as it opens a door to the foolish, the wicked; and the improper, it hath in it the nature of oppression. Men who look upon themselves born to reign, and others to obey, soon grow insolent; selected from the rest of mankind their minds are early poisoned by importance; and the world they act in differs so materially from the world at large, that they have but little opportunity of knowing its true interests, and when they succeed to the government are frequently the most ignorant and unfit of any throughout the dominions.
Another evil which attends hereditary succession is, that the throne is subject to be possessed by a minor at any age; all which time the regency, acting under the cover of a king, have every opportunity and inducement to betray their trust. The same national misfortune happens, when a king worn out with age and infirmity, enters the last stage of human weakness. In both these cases the public becomes a prey to every miscreant, who can tamper successfully with the follies either of age or infancy.
…In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society, and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived. – Common Sense
2 billion sleep-walking sheep watched two ne’er do wells get married on T.V.
Next – the public consummation.
Now, Her Highness is knocked up in the Royal Family Way. Oh yes, Celebrate, you filthy peasants, but don’t you dare call the hospital to ask if Kate is still throwing up. They’ll kill you for that.
Two Australian DJ’s called the hospital on-air. Mel Greig, (a woman) gave her best QEII impersonation and the nurse who answered the phone believed it and put the call through. The Duchess didn’t answer. Her attending nurse answered and also believed she was talking to the Queen.
It’s all fun and games until someone gets murdered by a hit-man
Jacintha Saldanha, the nurse who first answered the prank call was apparently so distraught over being fooled by these shock jocks, she was so overwrought with shame because she had helped those two Australian descendants of criminals to dare mock her gods of the English throne, this troubled her so much, that she felt that she would be better of dead and thus killed herself.
Can you hear the sarcasm in my voice?
The shock jocks will not be on-air until, further notice. Maybe being out of work, and the shame and guilt of this situation will drive them to commit “suicide” also.
In short, monarchy and succession have laid (not this or that kingdom only) but the world in blood and ashes. ‘Tis a form of government which the word of God bears testimony against, and blood will attend it. – Common Sense
- Map: Which of the world’s monarchies allow female royal succession (washingtonpost.com)
- U.K. Gets Commonwealth Consent to Change Royal Succession … – Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)
Representative Walter Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012 and the mainstream media failed to tell you about it.
The resolution accused the president of committing high crimes and misdemeanors; impeachable offenses.
Barack Obama and the defense secretary, Leon Panetta have declared their loyalties to the United Nations and NATO. They will no longer go to Congress for war authorization, but will send our people to war on the orders of foreign entities.
At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Panetta told John Mcain that we need to develop an international consensus to deal with Syria. He said that unilateral action made no sense.
Obama said that helping Syria was best for America’s interest. Why do we need international consensus for our interests?
Panetta told Mcain that he hadn’t done any detailed planning because he was waiting for direction from the president to do that. Mcain then read a Presidential Directive written by Obama. “The prevention of mass atrocities (in Syria) is a core national interest of the United States.”
If it is such a core national interest; why isn’t the nation debating it? Why aren’t the People writing, calling and visiting their Senators and Representatives and voicing their opinions on these matters? Why isn’t the decision to intervene in the Syrian situation being decided by Congress?
Because the President is a U.N. puppet and he will only do what he is told to do by his masters. We the People are not the presidents masters.
“Well let me tell you what’s wrong with your statement. You don’t mention American leadership. Americans should lead in this. Americans should be standing up. Americans should be building coalitions.” – John Mcain to Leon Panetta
But you didn’t see that on the nightly news. You didn’t read that in your newspapers. They did tell you about the false flag operation in Afghanistan that took place right after the Armed Services Committee hearing.
Leon Panetta went to visit the troops and an Afghan man tried to drive a flaming truck into his plane while it landed. They used this incident for a reason to disarm the troops attending Panetta’s speech.
It is not in numbers but in unity, that our great strength lies; yet our present numbers are sufficient to repel the force of all the world. The Continent hath, at this time, the largest body of armed and disciplined men of any power under Heaven… – Common Sense
I find it very strange and unusual for soldiers to not be trusted to be armed in the presence of their commanders, but it makes perfect sense when the commanders know the soldiers realize they are being led by traitors.
Maybe the soldiers understand how they were both fighting and taking orders from the enemy during the Korean Police Action. Maybe they know that al-Qaeda is a wholly owned subsidiary of the CIA.
Maybe Panetta is afraid of a mutiny.
236 years ago Thomas Paine wrote the pamphlet, Common Sense. Paine made arguments against British rule of America that are still relevant today with regards to the U.N.
Much hath been said of the united strength of Britain (U.N.) and the colonies, that in conjunction they might bid defiance to the world. But this is mere presumption; the fate of war is uncertain, neither do the expressions mean anything; for this continent would never suffer itself to be drained of inhabitants to support the British arms in either Asia, Africa, or Europe.
Besides, what have we to do with setting the world at defiance? Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to,will secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe; because it is the interest of all Europe to have America a free port. Her trade will always be a protection, and her barrenness of gold and silver secure her from invaders.
I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to show, a single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected with Great Britain (U.N.). I repeat the challenge, not a single advantage is derived. Our corn (iPads, Hollywood entertainment) will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our imported goods must be paid for buy them where we will.
But the injuries and disadvantages we sustain by that connection, are without number; and our duty to mankind I at large, as well as to ourselves, instruct us to renounce the alliance: Because, any submission to, or dependance on Great Britain (U.N./NATO), tends directly to involve this continent in European wars and quarrels; and sets us at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our friendship, and against whom, we have neither anger nor complaint. As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial connection with any part of it. It is the true interest of America to steer clear of European contentions, which she never can do, while by her dependance on Britain (U.N.), she is made the make-weight in the scale of British (international) politics.
The authority of Great Britain (U.N.) over this continent, is a form of government, which sooner or later must have an end: And a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful and positive conviction, that what he calls “the present constitution” is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And by a plain method of argument, as we are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it, otherwise we use them meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty rightly, we should take our children in our hand, and fix our station a few years farther into life; that eminence will present a prospect, which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our sight.
Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions:
Interested men, who are not to be trusted; weak men who cannot see; prejudiced men who will not see; and a certain set of moderate men, who think better of the European world than it deserves; and this last class by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent than all the other three. – Common Sense
Do you espouse the U.N., One World Government, Usurpation of Sovereignty doctrine? Which of those descriptions do you fit?
It is not in the power of Britain or of Europe to conquer America, if she do not conquer herself by delay and timidity. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful.
It is repugnant to reason, to the universal order of things, to all examples from the former ages, to suppose, that this continent can longer remain subject to any external power. The most sanguine in Britain does not think so. The utmost stretch of human wisdom cannot, at this time compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the continent even a year’s security. Reconciliation is was a fallacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connection, and Art cannot supply her place. For, as Milton wisely expresses, “never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep.” – Common Sense
The U.N. is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They do not want to help you. What have they done for the Freedom Fighters in Tibet, China, Myanmar, Sudan, Rwanda, South Africa, and Syria?
Their “humanitarian” missions are facades and false flags. They only go into countries where their gold and fiat money, mineral, oil and other natural resource interests are threatened. They make up a boogeyman or foment crises and invade the country in the name of “humanitarianism”.
They ignored Africa’s real problems for years and now they have created Kony and are trying to convince us to support an invasion of Uganda although the Ugandans say Kony has probably been dead for years.
Much of our economy is based on information, electronics and gadgets. Uganda and Africa have the minerals needed for your Apple and Hewlett-Packard products. They believe Africans are too stupid to procure and sell them to us, so the U.N. must take them by force.
Therefore, all countries should implement previous commitments to halt and reverse protectionism and further expand market access, particularly in areas of interest to developing countries. This improvement of market access will be facilitated by appropriate structural adjustment in developed countries. Developing countries should continue the trade-policy reforms and structural adjustment they have undertaken. It is thus urgent to achieve an improvement in market access conditions for commodities, notably through the progressive removal of barriers that restrict imports, particularly from developing countries, of commodity products in primary and processed forms… – Agenda 21
The U.N. is after the sovereignty of your country. The U.N. is after your personal sovereignty and freedom.
Why do they have the Codex Alimenterius? Do you understand that the U.N. feels that you are too stupid to decide what to eat? They feel you are too stupid to decide for yourself what natural herbs, vitamins and minerals you should use for your health?
Already negative trends of the past half century have been accelerated by the recent rules of global trade and finance from global bureaucracies like the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Codex Alimentarius, among others. These institutions have codified policies designed to serve the interests of global agribusiness above all others, while actively undermining the rights of farmers and consumers, as well as the ability of nations to regulate trade across their own borders or to apply standards appropriate to their communities. Rules contained in the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (of the WTO), for example, have empowered global agricultural corporations to seize much of the world’s seed supply, foods and agricultural lands. The globalization of corporate-friendly patent regimes has also directly undermined indigenous and traditional sui generis rights of farmers, for example, to save seeds and protect indigenous varieties they have developed over millennia.
…All human beings on the planet have a fundamental human right to access and/or to produce sufficient food to sustain their lives and communities. All rules and policies should be aligned to recognize this basic right. Every government—local, regional, national, international—is obliged to guarantee this right. It may not be denied in the interests of international commercial or trade processes, or for any other reason. – Manifesto on the Future of Food
The U.N. doesn’t think so. How can you have access to or produce food without farms? How can you have a farm without land?
“Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for the public can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole… Public control of land use is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievement of the long-term objectives of human settlement policies and strategies. – Settlement Planning and Development: A Strategy For Land Policy
The U.N.’s Agenda 21 seeks to eliminate private property. The policies are carried out by local groups and NGO’s under the name of sustainability and other “feel-good” phrases. For example, Michigan is working to eliminate heritage breed pigs, claiming its goal is to eradicate dangerous feral swine, or Executive Order 13575 that establishes the White House Rural Council.
Look for Agenda 21 implementation and indoctrination in your area. Find out if your locality has any ICLEI programs.
The ICLEI is used to carry out Agenda 21 because if they told you what it really was, you would not accept it.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy – fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined -the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” – J. Gary Lawrence, Council on Sustainable Development
Everything is fine. Go back to sleep.
Now wake up!
Barack Hussein Obama is the Manchurian Candidate. He cares more about the rest of the world than he does the United States. He and his masters are not loyal to any nation.
We don’t need borders if we don’t have sovereignty. You can’t call someone an illegal alien if they are a citizen of the world. You’re a racist for insisting they learn your language when they live in your country.
Did you hear Obama’s speech in Germany? It sounded like English, but he was really speaking the Globalist, New World Order language.
Where have I heard that global citizenship, national cooperation talk before?
“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.” -Maurice Strong , Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Can’t you see that Barack Obama does not work for the American people?
“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles and small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Sound familiar? Where else have you heard that statement? Who else do you know, who talks like that?
Are you ready to write some letters and make some phone calls now?
It is time to rid ourselves of treasonous traitors. It is time to withdraw our membership from the U.N. and evict them from their New York City headquarters. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful. If we don’t reclaim our sovereignty, American life will be like the movie, The Hunger Games.
“AGENDA 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth… Effective execution of AGENDA 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society,unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” – Daniel Sitarz
What do you think that means; an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources?
and is there any man so unwise, as not to see, that (considering what has happened) he will suffer no Law to be made here, but such as suit his purpose? We may be as effectually enslaved by the want of laws in America, as by submitting to laws made for us in England (U.N.). After matters are make up (as it is called) can there be any doubt but the whole power of the crown (Secretary-General) will be exerted, to keep this continent as low and humble as possible? Instead of going forward we shall go backward, or be perpetually quarrelling or ridiculously petitioning. We are already greater than the king (Globalist Elitists) wishes us to be, and will he not hereafter endeavor to make us less? To bring the matter to one point. Is the power who is jealous of our prosperity, a proper power to govern us? Whoever says No to this question is an independent… – Common Sense
Hidden in plain sight are the Georgia Guidestones where the goal of reducing the population from seven to one-half a billion people is chiseled in different languages.
What are you going to do about it? Wake up and realize that this is real and it is really happening now. Ask your parents what life was like before. Compare it to now. Can’t you see the progression of martial law and tyranny?
We used to be able to smoke anywhere. Now some people aren’t allowed to smoke in their homes. Kids used to bring their rifles to school on days their gun clubs met. Now parents get arrested if their kid draws a picture of them with a gun. We used to be able to drive down the street with a beer in hand. Now people get arrested for not wearing a seatbelt. The store used to give us bags to carry our groceries home. Now if your city hasn’t banned them; you must pay a tax for a bag. There used to be water fountains everywhere. Not even the parks in my city have fountains.
Do you remember the good-ol’ days when you had habeus corpus, when you could protest politicians, when you could get on an airplane without people touching your children’s genitals and ogling naked pictures of your wife? Do you remember when you were free to control your own health care?
You must fight it. If you weren’t born into the élite, ruling, banking, globalist class, you will never be one of them. You can’t join them. You can’t appease them. You can’t conciliate. You may feel like you’re in the club. They may make you feel welcome and useful, but trust me; when there’s no one else left, they will eventually kill you too.
Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning- and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of Europe absolute: Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore since nothing but blows will do, for God’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child… – Common Sense
Impeach Obama and Panetta. It makes Common Sense.
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia, and Africa, have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.
…To conclude: However strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given, to show, that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration for independence.
… let each of us, hold out to his neighbor the hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line, which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every former dissention. Let the names of Whig (Republican) and Tory (Democrat) be extinct; and let none other be heard among us, than those of a good citizen, an open and resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the RIGHTS of MANKIND and of the FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES OF AMERICA. – Common Sense
- H. Con. Res. 107: Impeach Obama! (freedomfighterusa.wordpress.com)