May Your Chains Set Lightly Upon You

Posts tagged “Andrew Breitbart

Surprised? Barack Obama: Compa De Los Venceremos Y Cuba

Barack Obama is all over the news today because he shook hands with Raul Castro at the funeral of world renowned Communist, Nelson Mandela. The Libruls are loving it. To them it means Obama is finally coming out of the Communist closet and we can finally, openly be Authoritarian Fascists. The Right-Wing thinks the same thing. They said he bounded up the stairs, smiling, with open arms to meet the Dictator like a child when his daddy comes home from work.

It looks to me like he had to walk past the Dictator to get to his seat. It would have been impolite to not greet the man especially since he greeted and shook hands with everyone else. I’m more interested in all the Masonic Shibboleth handshakes and 5 point hugs.5point masoni62 masonic2_5pthug

Is it a big deal that Obama shook hands with with Castro? New World Order Gatekeeper, Rush Limbaugh says no. He said Obama wasn’t sending a message by shaking Catro’s hand. He thnks Obama is too narcissistic to have even recognized him. Limbaugh wouldn’t make a big deal about this because Obama isn’t even interested in Castro’s tiny little island.

I say Obama is very interested in that little island. Cuba is muy lindo y querido (beautiful and dear) to Obama’s heart. Obama is a compa de los Venceremos y cuba (Obama is a buddy of the Venceremos and Cuba).

Obama denies it, but I’m sure he pulled the strings to allow his compas, Jay-Z and Beyoncè to visit there. I’m sure he told him where all the best hotels, restaurants, clubs and cigars are too.

How would he know?

I told you a year and two months ago that he’s been to Cuba. Here is the article below:

If Obama wins the 2012 election; you’d better learn Spanish.

Barack Obama is a Manchurian Candidate. He is a puppet for Bill Ayers, The Weathermen, Fidel Castro and the defunct USSR.

How do I know this?

Well, you should already know of Obama’s ties to Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine. You should already know that they were in The Weathermen, and you should already know about the Weathermen.

In case you’ve been sleepwalking; here is a video to catch you up on Ayers, The Weathermen, and The Venceremos

Andrew Breitbart said that he had a video that was going to force us to really vet Obama. He said the video showed silver-haired pony-tailed communist talking about taking over America.

Breitbart was assasinated the day before he was to release the video.

An old video of Obama giving a speech was shown. They tried to say it was the video Breitbart was talking about. This video showed no silver-haired communists. The video died with Breitbart, but I believe I may have stumbled upon the information he wanted to reveal.

I was watching a 1982 documentary on terrorism, No Place To Hide. Ten minutes in, Larry Grathwohl comes on and talks about the Weathermen and The Venceremos. While he is talking some very interesting pictures are displayed…

Who is that smiling young man with the hat on the right?

Does he look familiar?

I Think Obama picked up smoking in Cuba?

Isn’t it illegal for us to travel to Cuba?

Did Obama go there anyway with The Venceremos?

A picture is worth a thousand words.

Esteemed members of the Venceremos Brigade:

I am proud to be standing here in front of you to report that the mission of the distinguished agent, William Ayers, has culminated in incalculable success. For the first time in the history of the Cuban Revolution, the vanguard of all independent and revolutionary movements around the world, we have been able to infiltrate the government of the United States with an agent of international socialism. Yes, comrades, I refer to our brother in arms,who we met through Ayers that glorious day in our training camp, Barack Obama.
Now, with the guaranteed victory of Obama in the polls, the revolution in Cuba, the revolution in Venezuela,in Bolivia, in Iran, and around the Earth, will have the US as an ally, with all of its political, economic, and military power. In the first month of the Obama presidency, the Comandant predicts that the US will pay reparations to Cuba for their criminal embargo over the many cruel decades.
The Comandant informs us that Obama will surrender to Cuba various nuclear arms in a form of self-defense. In case of a likely coup.
Comrades, we have destroyed Imperialism from the inside, now that it has become difficult to attack from outside. This clandestine campaign, begun 45 years ago, demonstrates that though the fight may be long, he who does not give up will emerge victorious.
We regret that it was the Chicago cell instead of the Miami cell that was able to ascend to the highest governmental position.
Meanwhile, we will continue to support the liberals with fanatical fervor.
Friends, this is the true change. The hope of a new day.

Comrades, yes we can! Long live the Revolution! Long live Fidel! Long live Obama! And long live Cuba!

I believe that Breitbart had better evidence than these pictures. I believe he was assassinated to keep you from knowing that Obama traveled to Cuba to receive instructions/programming from the Soviets via Fidel Castro.

I suggest you watch No Place To Hide. Larry Grathwohl talks about when he infiltrated The Weathermen and learned of their plans for us. When they take over this country they will need to imprison and kill 25 million of us. That was in 1982. The United States’ population has grown considerably since then. That means they’ll need to get rid of much more than 25 million dissenters. Think about that when you go to the voting booth.

Think about those stacks of caskets in Georgia. Think about the billions of hollow point bullets the government is buying.

Obama will be free to carry out his master’s plans during his lame-duck second term.

If I’m able to continue writing this website from the re-education camp; I’ll say, “I told you so.”

¡Hasta la victoria siempre!

Whose victory do you await?


If We’re Losing the Information War, Then Someone Is Winning It

Are you losing the information war? Not if you’re reading this. If you read The Freedom Fighter, you will get the news that the so-called Mainstream Media will not or can not deliver to you.

I am not a stooge or shill for any government or corporation. I alone decide what information is published to this medium. No one tells me what to write or what not to write.

I will not be a puppet. I may be imprisoned or murdered for defending the first amendment. You may be thrown in jail for reading this.

Another dilemma is whether to target the supply side of the conspiracy theory or the demand side. Should governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers, with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be addressed to the mass audience, with a view to inoculating them from pernicious theories? – Conspiracy Theories

I will always fight for knowledge of the truth and I will strive to  tell you the truth because; who else will?

Who told you that a resolution was introduced to Impeach the President? Who told you about the Gas Price Spike Act, that if passed will make everything you buy cost more money? Who told you that the DHS/TSA is working on expanding their operations to your neighborhood? Who told you that Obamacare will lead to our priests, pastors, rabbis and imams being imprisoned? Who told you that the First Amendment has effectively been repealed?

Not the people who studied Communications and Journalism in college. Not the people who work in Mainstream Media for large corporations, making six figure and million dollar salaries.

Why didn’t they tell you these things? Did they not know? They have news feeds from AP, Reuters, et al. They have reporters on the beat. They have sources. It is their profession and living.

They knew. Someone decided not to tell you. Someone  ordered them not tell you.

We begin by discussing different understandings of the nature of conspiracy theories and different accounts of the kinds of errors made by those who hold them. Our primary claim is that conspiracy theories typically stem not from irrationality or mental illness of any kind but from a “crippled epistemology,” in the form of a sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources. Those who hold conspiracy theories do so because of what they read and hear. In that sense, acceptance of such theories is not irrational from the standpoint of those who adhere to them. There is a close connection, we suggest, between our claim on this count and the empirical association between terrorist behavior and an absence of civil rights and civil liberties.10 When civil rights and civil liberties are absent, people lack multiple information sources, and they are more likely to accept conspiracy theories. – Conspiracy Theories

How ironic. Cass Sunstein wrote Conspiracy Theories  so the Government could use it to fight people like me. He says we make up theories based on what we read and hear. What I read is Government documents. What I hear are the words of the politicians themselves. How is that a theory? I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I’m a conspiracy realist.


an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.                                                                                                                        –

Conspiracy theories turn out to be especially hard to undermine or dislodge; they have a self-sealing quality, rendering them particularly immune to challenge… We bracket the most difficult questions here and suggest more intuitively that a conspiracy theory can generally be counted as such if it is an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role… conspiracy theories have some distinctive features, above all because of their self-sealing quality; the very arguments that give rise to them, and account for their plausibility, make it more difficult for outsiders to rebut or even to question them… This account seems to capture the essence of the most prominent and influential conspiracy theories… Of course some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true.  – Conspiracy Theories

Sunstein says that we are terrorists if we insist on open, transparent government, if we insist on having true, factual information. He understands the results of an absence of civil rights and multiple sources of information, but instead of restoring civil rights and allowing the free flow of information; people of his ilk want to label us as terrorists and eradicate truth and freedom.

This is not, and is not be intended to be, a general claim that conspiracy theories are unjustified or unwarranted. Much depends on the background state of knowledge producing institutions. If those institutions are generally trustworthy, in part because they are embedded in an open society with a well-functioning marketplace of ideas and free flow of information, then conspiracy theories will generally (which is not to say always) be unjustified. On the other hand, individuals in societies with systematically malfunctioning or skewed institutions of knowledge – say, individuals who live in an authoritarian regime lacking a free press – may have good reason to distrust all or most of the official denials they hear… we will focus on indirect means of undermining such theories, principally by breaking up the closed informational networks that produce such theories… What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1)Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. – Conspiracy Theories

Or you could murder them. Do you remember that? Do you remember all the so-called Conservative show hosts and pundits who laughed and mocked him? Why didn’t they tell you that he was arrested right after asking John Kerry about the Skull and Bones? Who else asked inappropriate questions about Skull and Bones? Tim Russert was the only legitimate, credible man in the Mainstream Media. I’m surprised that any politician would appear on Meet the Press because Russert’s bullshit detector was very sensitive and always set on high. He did not have a “crippled epistemology.” He always showed evidence of his claims. Tim Russert died  suddenly of a heart attack.

“Barack Obama is a radical. We should not be afraid to say that.”                                                                                                      – Andrew Breitbart

Yes we should. Breitbart died of a heart attack the day he planned to release those videos. They said he died of heart attack while he was still on the sidewalk. Breitbart and Russert asked the wrong questions and paid for it with their lives. They both died of heart attacks. Casualties of the Information War.

Imagine a government facing a population in which a particular conspiracy theory is becoming widespread. We will identify two basic dilemmas that recur, and consider how government should respond. The first dilemma is whether to ignore or rebut the theory; the second is whether to address the supply side of conspiracy theorizing by attempting to debias or disable its purveyors, to address the demand side by attempting to immunize third-party audiences from the theory’s effects, or to do both… Government is faced with suppliers of conspiracy theories, and might aim at least in part to persuade, debias, or silence those suppliers. – Conspiracy Theories

Don’t worry. You won’t have a “heart attack” if you believe in the correct, Government approved conspiracies.

Not all false conspiracy theories are harmful; consider the false conspiracy theory, held by many of the younger members of our society, that a secret group of elves, working in a remote location under the leadership of the mysterious “Santa Claus,” make and distribute presents on Christmas Eve. This theory is false, but is itself instilled through a widespread conspiracy of the powerful – parents – who conceal their role in the whole affair. (Consider too the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.) It is an open question whether most conspiracy theories are equally benign; we will suggest that some are not benign at all… If children believe in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny, there is no problem for government to solve… – Conspiracy Theories

So, do you understand? Be good, obedient wards of the State, and keep your mouth shut. Don’t say things that might be offensive. Don’t say things that might not be true.

Why do you want to cause problems for the Government. It is too difficult for them to deal with so much free speech. They must infiltrate too many organizations. They must pay people to put out mis/disinformation to counter yours. If they put out anonymous information, they’ll lose credibility. If they do it themselves, they lose credibility. If they do nothing, they lose credibility. If they try to stop it, they’re evil. If you lie, they must stop you from lying. If you tell the truth, they must stop you from telling the truth. When they carry out nefarious conspiracies, they must keep them secret, but since we live in an open, democratic society, the secret is eventually exposed. If they don’t try to keep it secret, we may not allow them to do it. Why do you want to make it so hard for them to do what they know is best for you? Why don’t you just be a good citizen, and stop consuming alternative news sources? Why don’t you stop asking questions and just STFU and be a good controllable citizen?

I don’t watch TV. I don’t read the newspaper. I read articles on Drudge Report, I listen to talk radio all day every day, left and right-wing. Before I started writing this magazine, I believed the conservative talk show hosts were credible. I’ve lost respect for many of them because of their lack of coverage of news that is truly important.

The news-people I give credence to are: Lyndon Larouche, Hal Lindsey, and Republic Broadcasting Network, especially Clint Richardson on The Corporation Nation.

Who do you think is winning and losing the Information War?

Information – Get it while you still can!


But, I’m not going to

I can fix everything I own, except my iPhone, but I’ll eventually learn how that works too. I was doing routine maintenance on my computer when I bent a pin on the processor. I immediately got on my iPhone and ordered a new one.

It took too long to arrive and I missed last Sunday’s deadline to publish The Freedom Fighter. I tried my best to write last week’s edition on my iPhone, but it is not a suitable alternative.

The Freedom Fighter is back and I am pleased to say that the Department of Homeland Security didn’t shut me down. Not yet.

Since 2010 The DHS has been surveilling and collecting information on, “U.S. and foreign private sector officials and spokespersons who make public statements or provide public updates; 5) names of anchors, newscasters, or on-scene reporters who are known or identified as reporters in their post or article or who use traditional and/or social media in real-time to keep their audience situationally aware and informed;” – DHS

Is all this needed to say that DHS may look up numbers in the phonebook? Was the DHS allowed to read a blog, newspaper, or watch a news broadcast before these rules were written?

I think the DHS wants to make sure you keep sleepwalking. Why do they need a dossier of names of those who keep you situationally aware and informed?

Andrew Breitbart was known for making people situationally aware and informed. The information he presented has caused people in the government to lose their jobs.

Was this announcement at the 2012 CPAC the final straw for the Obama administration? I’m sure they wish they had the SpeechJammer that night.

Imagine how this device is going to affect freedom of speech and situational awareness.

Was Breitbart’s PII collected by the DHS? Was he at the top of the hit list?

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America states:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident… That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among, Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a Government… – Declaration of Independence

Why is the DHS so concerned about the press? We are supposed to have freedom of the press. The Declaration of Independence says it is our duty to install a just government. If the Government was right; I don’t think it would fight us when we expose its corruption and seek to correct it.

The press should not be a threat to a just, righteous and moral Government.