…How can Satan cast out Satan? For if a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom is not able to stand. And if a house is divided against itself, that house is not able to stand. And if Satan has risen up against himself, he would be divided, and he would not be able to stand: instead he reaches the end. No one is able to plunder the goods of a strong man, having entered into the house, unless he first binds the strong man, and then he shall plunder his house. – Mark 3:25-27
A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently… – Abraham Lincoln
There are people who want what we have, but they can’t just come here and take it. In America; there is a rifle behind every blade of grass. We also have a large military that hasn’t stood down for many decades. The United States probably can’t be successfully invaded without inside help.
When I was a child I had a Brother’s Grimm fairy tale book. I remember reading a story about a young man who had to kill two giants before they discovered and killed him. I’ve gone to bed and woken up a few times since then, so I don’t remember the details. I believe he waited for the giants to fall asleep. He then climbed a tree above them and dropped a rock atop one of the giant’s head. That giant blamed the other, so they fought and killed each other. Do you remember that story? How about the story of how Nathan Rothschild fomented the American Civil War?
Follow the money. Who is behind the curtain now; controlling and financing both sides of the conflict?
As of now 844,277 people have signed petitions on WhiteHouse.Gov asking the President to allow their states or cities to secede from the United States. 844,277 out of 314,686,189, about .027% of the population, have signed petitions to secede and this is major news?
The mainstream media will talk about this, but not a word about a Congressman’s resolution to impeach the President. They said nothing about the repeal of the First Amendment, dead babies in your food, dead bodies in your water supply, the TSA coming to your front yards, or anything of real importance. The mainstream media’s job is to keep you distracted, and that is what they are doing by hyping this secession story.
These are petitions on The White House website signed by .027% of the population. Who signed them? Who signed them more than once? Who signed them for states they don’t reside? How many bots signed them? How many minors? How many illegal aliens?
I know that no state governors have petitioned for secession. I know that no state legislatures have petitioned or written any declarations.
I have two problems with these petitions. One: They all use one of two templates. one of the templates contains a misspelled word.
Peacefully grant the State of Utah to withdraw from the United States of America and create its own NEW government.
We the people of the great state of Utah, do see that in today’s world the Federal Government has not led our citizens justly and with honor. We therefore as free men and women of our great state do believe that it is time to take matter upon ourselves to ensure our continued freedom, and to enact our own laws and here buy govern ourselves without the federal government’s involvement in our internal matters from this day forward. – WhiteHouse.Gov
I know freedom isn’t free, but you can’t come here to buy it. The word is, hereby. I can’t take you seriously if you can’t spell. I don’t think the President will either.
Two: They all use the word, peacefully. How can a state peacefully secede?
Barack Hussein Obama will not allow it. He will destroy us.
Abraham Lincoln is Obama’s favorite president. If he is confronted with a rebellion; he will do the same as Lincoln.
They used the same Bible at their inaugurations.
They both served in the Illinois Legislature.
Obama is tall and skinny like Lincoln was.
Obama recreated Lincoln’s train ride from Philadelphia to Washington D.C.
Lincoln was a lawyer, as is Obama.
Obama often quotes Lincoln. He delivered a speech at the opening of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum and Library in Lincoln, Illinois.
Obama announced his candidacy for President in Springfield, Illinois, the old state capitol where Lincoln lived and served.
Joseph Biden threatened George W. Bush with impeachment if he went to war without congressional approval. Abraham Lincoln accused James K. Polk of arbitrarily making war with Texas/Mexico, just as monarchs do, and that the Constitutional Convention recognized that war-making power must not be in the hands of one man.
Lincoln expanded the army and started the Civil War, and transferred federal funds to private parties without congressional approval.
Obama took us to war in Libya and is planning to do the same in Syria without congressional approval.
Lincoln suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Obama signed the 2012 NDAA which provides for the indefinite detention of Americans.
Lincoln suppressed free speech.
Obama signed H.R. 347 into law which restricts our right to criticize government officials.
Obama has more tools, more soldiers, more weapons to use against us. He has the support of the U.N. and the International Banking Cartel.
I expect he will treat us much worse than Lincoln.
Lincoln freed the African slaves, but I believe Obama’s goal is to enslave us all.
“The hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte
My father has taught American History, Government, and Geography for the past four decades, so I called him to conduct a thought experiment about this issue.
He asked me how can a state secede?
I replied: The state would announce its intention to secede, write a new constitution, set-up a new government, and seek to be recognized by other sovereign states.
My father said that Article 3 Section 3 of the Constitution outlaws secession.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them…
My argument is that, it says, levying War against them. Who is, them? I believe, them, are the states and not the federal government. Also seceding is not a declaration or an act of war against anyone. It is simply a withdrawal from the Union, nothing violent or aggressive.
My father pointed out to me that it does not matter. It didn’t matter for Fort Sumter in 1861, it won’t matter today.
The federal government cannot declare war against or attack the states. It can defend itself, and it will. Lincoln goaded South Carolina into firing the first shot.
If a state secedes from the union; it will be saturated with armed federal soldiers and agents. That state’s Capitol will be surrounded by troops. The federal government will do everything short of violence to take full control of that state.
Can you say, False Flag?
You can count on a false flag operation occurring to convict the secessionists of treason and justify war on the federal government’s behalf.
Secession will lead to civil war.
What President would be willing to be remembered for presiding over the dissolution of the Union?
Lincoln wasn’t. Obama won’t be either.
What if we fight a civil war and win?
I believe that then, if we seek to truly remain sovereign and independent; the next war will start.
Who will recognize our new nation or nations?
Have you ever wondered why there are only four nations that are not members of the United Nations?
South Sudan is a brand new nation and is most likely working hard on its U.N. membership application.
Azawad became a nation, April 2012 and joined the U.N. immediately after.
The U.N. is the progenitor of the One World Government prophesied of in the Book of Revelations and other parts of the Bible.
Not fellowshipping with them is the same as declaring war against them.
To join them is to give them all your sovereignty, freedom and liberty.
If any state successfully secedes from the Union; it must also fight the U.N. (the world) or its efforts are for naught.
Have you ever wondered why there are only five nations lacking a Rothschild-controlled central bank?
They are: Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Andorra and Monaco.
Do you think our new nation or nations will be allowed to print our own interest-free money without fighting a bloody war against the Rothschild controlled International Banking Cartel? Do you think they’ll refrain from using nuclear weapons against us?
Ask Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, James A. Garfield, William Mckinley, and John F. Kennedy, Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gahdaffi. I think they’ll tell you, it is dangerous to mess with the money.
“The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War.” – Benjamin Franklin
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison
“The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy.” – Abraham Lincoln
“The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom… I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America, and use it systematically to corrupt modern civilization. They will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their inheritance.” – Otto von Bismark
“These International Bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of newspapers and the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of public office officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government.” – Theodore Roosevelt
“It was not accidental. It was a carefully contrived occurrence… The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.” – Louis T. McFadden
“The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained as one block, and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world.” – Otto von Bismark
“By the adoption of these principles… the taxpayer will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” – Abraham Lincoln
“I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations which grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” – Thomas Jefferson
War is expensive. Are any of you secession petitioners willing to sacrifice your life, liberty and fortune?
I doubt it.
I’ve yet to see it happen.
The Whiskey Rebellion happened because Alexander Hamilton needed to raise taxes to pay the Revolutionary War veterans.
George Washington fought the soldiers who helped him fight the British.
Hoovervilles were built around the White House by veterans owed money from Herbert Hoover. Hoover attacked and killed his own veterans.
It is sad that we have to fight external enemies only to have to fight each other over money.
But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after the righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness. Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses. – 1 Timothy 6: 9-12
Any state that secedes will have to fight a war. That state will need soldiers. Those soldiers must be equipped and fed. Food and equipment cost money. Where will that money come from?
Soldiers also want to be paid a salary and retirement benefits. Where will that money come from?
After all the death and destruction, the war-torn land will need to be rebuilt. Where will that money come from?
Enter the Rothschild-controlled International Banking Cartel, Central Banking, Federal Reserve, Internationational Monetary Fund, World Bank…
Ask Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, James A. Garfield, William Mckinley, and John F. Kennedy, Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gahdaffi what happens when you turn-down their “generosity”.
I am not accusing anyone of calling for civil war. A peaceful restoration of the constitution would be ideal, but unfortunately, the real world doesn’t work that way. One cannot ask for permission to be free. Freedom must be taken. I just want everyone to understand that secession will lead to civil war because some believe it is illegal and the President will not allow dissolution of the Union to be a part of his legacy. I want everyone to understand that if we win a civil war, we will then have to fight ourselves over money. I want everyone to understand that if we are able to secede and start a new nation or nations, or restore the Constitution; we will be pursued by the United Nations and The International Banking Cartel. If we join with them; it will only be a matter of a short time until we are beset with the same problems and issues that are fomenting secession today.
Secession must include a well-thought plan that considers these future variables. We must be prepared for all types of disasters, including nuclear war. We must be ready and willing to hold onto our sovereignty, freedom and liberty no matter what the cost.
I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. – Thomas Jefferson
So Snopes says it isn’t true that Medicare is required to ask about gun ownership. That doesn’t mean they can’t or won’t ask. I warned about this issue of doctors spying on us for the government in an article I wrote in March 2012, Guns! Part 2 – The Progression To Repeal the Second Amendment Is Happening 2 Fast 2 Furious. It isn’t true that the Japanese Navy commander said that we couldn’t be invaded because there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass, but the statement is trues nevertheless. It is true now anyway. That is why the Globalist New World Order bankers need us to disarm ourselves before they can overtly invade the United States.
This is one of their tactics: Unconstitutionally declare all of us unfit for gun ownership.
Get’em while you still can. Buy your guns with cash from private owners, gun shows, antique dealers, etc… Take a gunsmithing class and build your own if you have to.
Whatever you do; keep your mouth shut. If they ask, just say no. Acting irate and yelling, “None of your business!”, pretty much means, “Yes, I have guns in my house.”, and you get put on a list, and your door gets kicked in.
- Jacob Sullum on an Ideological Test for Gun Ownership (reason.com)
- Insanity of U.S. gun ownership (japantimes.co.jp)
- Harvard Study: Gun Control Is Counterproductive (maddmedic.wordpress.com)
Originally posted on Fellowship of the Minds:
I received this email from a trusted friend who forwarded it from her trusted friend. I have no idea if it’s the God’s honest truth or urban legend. It’s vitally important to verify the information.
Fact of Fiction?
Do you have a gun in your House?
When I had my gangrenous gallbladder taken out and spent an overnight stay which should have been 10 days if the insurance company had not kicked me out. I had a home nurse visits for two weeks and was asked if I had guns in the house. I responded that if I did I would not tell them. So the below has some merit.
FYI, I am passing this along…there are comments from two other people who have also been asked if we keep guns in the house. The nurse just kinda slipped it in along with all the other regular questions. I told her I…
View original 434 more words
From Fox News:
June 28 in Washington, in the final moments of a very serious, potentially fatal game between the Obama Administration and the People of the United States, a controversial call by replacement judges awarded an unconstitutional law (Obamacare) to the Obama Administration.
After what we saw, I think that many fans all over America are sleepless. Fans are worried and disappointed with the country they love.
I don’t blame them.
They deserve better. The fans watch the congress, they follow their parties, pay their taxes, and they don’t like what they are seeing.
Regular, patriotic judges are involved in a labor dispute with the NWO and are locked out.
There have been a number of controversies surrounding officiating in all freedom and liberty matters over the years, and it becomes part of the legend of the Republic. In the USA, “2012 NDAA,” “H.R. 347,” and “The Federal Reserve Act,” are all etched in the minds of liberty fans. How long of a life Thursday’s episode will have remains to be seen. My guess is that this too shall pass.
But the fact of the matter is, it should have never happened. The league said as much Friday in their press release which stated laws offensive to the Constitution of the United States should have been called, therefore ending the game.
Why is the USA League hiring incompetent judges? Where were they adjudicating before? Small claims court? Traffic court? I heard one sat on the bench of some juvenile court where his biggest case was some kid who broke the window in front of the grocery store.
I heard one of the officials uses the rule book of a different league and probably doesn’t even know our league’s rules.
The replacement officials on the bench are doing their best, but this is not what they do, and they are overmatched by the authority of the NWO, the antiquated rule book, and lack of integrity.
But the officials are not the game. Not to diminish them, but to be fair, everyone knows who Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham are. No one in this country can name all the current Supreme Court justices.
A few days ago I read the USA citizens association letter to the Obama Administration, which stated that there is, ” a deterioration of order, safety, and integrity to the Constitution.” While it deals in much rhetoric, the element of integrity is what is most important.
The integrity of the Constitution is sacrosanct. It is the pillar of what makes the Republic legitimate. That’s why there are so many rules in place that insure that the games are honest and fair. The second that the public thinks the games are not, is the moment that the fascination that people have with the USA will end.
I also heard Alex Jones, the head of the Liberty Movement, talking in an interview about how awful things are regarding this NWO lockout. He may be right. He also has the power to do something about it.
perhaps what happened in Washington will open the eyes on each side that damage is being done to the Country we all love.
All concerned should keep one thing in the forefront of their minds: the fans deserve better. Everyone needs to take a step back, and end this self inflicted wound.
- White House demands military prisons for Americans under NDAA (EndtheLie.com)
- Obama wins right to indefinitely detain Americans under NDAA (hangthebankers.com)
Equipped and packed with a funky jam finished the touch, hope for the best behind my back, UDS the band forcin’ a priest to bless my cassette dealin’ with armies of unbelievers leave us, deceive us, with rolled gold though the bubble-’o-soap ain’t bursting who’ll relieve us of the burden my style’s getting old. …just say a little prayer for my demo – Urban Dance Squad
Someone Shot up the movie theatre at the Dark Knight Rising première, so now you’ll hear all the usual cries for more people to carry guns with them in public. The people will lobby Congress to pass more gun laws, allowing for things like easier access to guns and ammunition, Federal subsidies for shooting ranges, and Pell grants for gun training classes. On T.V. the hosts and talking heads will lament the tragedy and they will all say, of course, that this wouldn’t have happened if everyone in the theatre were packing heat as well.
Of course the media news sources will remind you that the people who produce your entertainment have 13 witches pray over all the new albums, movies, books, etc. before it is sold. They pray for the new media to affect the consumer in its intended ways.
If you’ve spent enough time in Church, you understand praying over things. You’ve prayed for people to be healed or to find a job… In church we pray to God and ask him to bless us, and give us wisdom.
The people who program your control and indoctrination through the media do the opposite. They pray to Satan and ask him to let their works influence you into enslavement.
Jesus is your saviour, not Batman.
If you had your gun with you; you could have stopped and killed that man instead of fleeing and ditching your family.
Jesus saved you because you sincerely prayed to him for the first time in years.
Jesus is very wise. He said, “he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.” – Luke 22:36
Unfortunately, with nearly half the country on some type of Government welfare: I think too many of us would give up our right to bear arms in exchange for free clothes.
Why do you need a gun when you can just wait 10 minutes for the police to show up?
Their prayers were answered when you went to sleep and didn’t see that this is happening while the U.N. is working on confiscating our weapons. Their deadline is right after the end of this year’s Bohemian Grove rituals, but of course the American people are awake and could see that it is not a coincidence that this massacre happens between the Bilderberg meeting and the Bohemian Grove, and during the arms treaty negotiations. We saw through their plans and false flag operations and thanks to the United States; the U.N. arms treaty has failed!
“This was stunning cowardice by the Obama administration, which at the last minute did an about-face and scuttled progress toward a global arms treaty, just as it reached the finish line,” said Suzanne Nossel, executive director of Amnesty International USA. “It’s a staggering abdication of leadership by the world’s largest exporter of conventional weapons to pull the plug on the talks just as they were nearing an historic breakthrough.”
A Western diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, also blamed the U.S., saying “they derailed the process,” adding that nothing will happen to revive negotiations until after the U.S. presidential election in November. – CBS News
Get ‘em while you still can.
Vote while you still can.
This election is extremely important. The next President is going to choose the next Supreme Court Justice. He will be crucial to next year’s arms treaty talks.
Who are you going to choose? A freedom and liberty loving patriot like Ron Paul or Gary Johnson, or a control-freak Statist like Barack Obama or Mitt Romney?
The New World Order already has your mind. They can’t get your body until they get your guns. Choose carefully.
- Bohemian Grove protests increase – Denver Activism | Examiner.com (2012indyinfo.com)
- The U.N.’s Gun Grab (personalliberty.com)
- Occupiers to protest Bohemian Grove (rt.com)
Representative Walter Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012 and the mainstream media failed to tell you about it.
The resolution accused the president of committing high crimes and misdemeanors; impeachable offenses.
Barack Obama and the defense secretary, Leon Panetta have declared their loyalties to the United Nations and NATO. They will no longer go to Congress for war authorization, but will send our people to war on the orders of foreign entities.
At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Panetta told John Mcain that we need to develop an international consensus to deal with Syria. He said that unilateral action made no sense.
Obama said that helping Syria was best for America’s interest. Why do we need international consensus for our interests?
Panetta told Mcain that he hadn’t done any detailed planning because he was waiting for direction from the president to do that. Mcain then read a Presidential Directive written by Obama. “The prevention of mass atrocities (in Syria) is a core national interest of the United States.”
If it is such a core national interest; why isn’t the nation debating it? Why aren’t the People writing, calling and visiting their Senators and Representatives and voicing their opinions on these matters? Why isn’t the decision to intervene in the Syrian situation being decided by Congress?
Because the President is a U.N. puppet and he will only do what he is told to do by his masters. We the People are not the presidents masters.
“Well let me tell you what’s wrong with your statement. You don’t mention American leadership. Americans should lead in this. Americans should be standing up. Americans should be building coalitions.” – John Mcain to Leon Panetta
But you didn’t see that on the nightly news. You didn’t read that in your newspapers. They did tell you about the false flag operation in Afghanistan that took place right after the Armed Services Committee hearing.
Leon Panetta went to visit the troops and an Afghan man tried to drive a flaming truck into his plane while it landed. They used this incident for a reason to disarm the troops attending Panetta’s speech.
It is not in numbers but in unity, that our great strength lies; yet our present numbers are sufficient to repel the force of all the world. The Continent hath, at this time, the largest body of armed and disciplined men of any power under Heaven… – Common Sense
I find it very strange and unusual for soldiers to not be trusted to be armed in the presence of their commanders, but it makes perfect sense when the commanders know the soldiers realize they are being led by traitors.
Maybe the soldiers understand how they were both fighting and taking orders from the enemy during the Korean Police Action. Maybe they know that al-Qaeda is a wholly owned subsidiary of the CIA.
Maybe Panetta is afraid of a mutiny.
236 years ago Thomas Paine wrote the pamphlet, Common Sense. Paine made arguments against British rule of America that are still relevant today with regards to the U.N.
Much hath been said of the united strength of Britain (U.N.) and the colonies, that in conjunction they might bid defiance to the world. But this is mere presumption; the fate of war is uncertain, neither do the expressions mean anything; for this continent would never suffer itself to be drained of inhabitants to support the British arms in either Asia, Africa, or Europe.
Besides, what have we to do with setting the world at defiance? Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to,will secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe; because it is the interest of all Europe to have America a free port. Her trade will always be a protection, and her barrenness of gold and silver secure her from invaders.
I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to show, a single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected with Great Britain (U.N.). I repeat the challenge, not a single advantage is derived. Our corn (iPads, Hollywood entertainment) will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our imported goods must be paid for buy them where we will.
But the injuries and disadvantages we sustain by that connection, are without number; and our duty to mankind I at large, as well as to ourselves, instruct us to renounce the alliance: Because, any submission to, or dependance on Great Britain (U.N./NATO), tends directly to involve this continent in European wars and quarrels; and sets us at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our friendship, and against whom, we have neither anger nor complaint. As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial connection with any part of it. It is the true interest of America to steer clear of European contentions, which she never can do, while by her dependance on Britain (U.N.), she is made the make-weight in the scale of British (international) politics.
The authority of Great Britain (U.N.) over this continent, is a form of government, which sooner or later must have an end: And a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful and positive conviction, that what he calls “the present constitution” is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And by a plain method of argument, as we are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it, otherwise we use them meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty rightly, we should take our children in our hand, and fix our station a few years farther into life; that eminence will present a prospect, which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our sight.
Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions:
Interested men, who are not to be trusted; weak men who cannot see; prejudiced men who will not see; and a certain set of moderate men, who think better of the European world than it deserves; and this last class by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent than all the other three. – Common Sense
Do you espouse the U.N., One World Government, Usurpation of Sovereignty doctrine? Which of those descriptions do you fit?
It is not in the power of Britain or of Europe to conquer America, if she do not conquer herself by delay and timidity. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful.
It is repugnant to reason, to the universal order of things, to all examples from the former ages, to suppose, that this continent can longer remain subject to any external power. The most sanguine in Britain does not think so. The utmost stretch of human wisdom cannot, at this time compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the continent even a year’s security. Reconciliation is was a fallacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connection, and Art cannot supply her place. For, as Milton wisely expresses, “never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep.” - Common Sense
The U.N. is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They do not want to help you. What have they done for the Freedom Fighters in Tibet, China, Myanmar, Sudan, Rwanda, South Africa, and Syria?
Their “humanitarian” missions are facades and false flags. They only go into countries where their gold and fiat money, mineral, oil and other natural resource interests are threatened. They make up a boogeyman or foment crises and invade the country in the name of “humanitarianism”.
They ignored Africa’s real problems for years and now they have created Kony and are trying to convince us to support an invasion of Uganda although the Ugandans say Kony has probably been dead for years.
Much of our economy is based on information, electronics and gadgets. Uganda and Africa have the minerals needed for your Apple and Hewlett-Packard products. They believe Africans are too stupid to procure and sell them to us, so the U.N. must take them by force.
Therefore, all countries should implement previous commitments to halt and reverse protectionism and further expand market access, particularly in areas of interest to developing countries. This improvement of market access will be facilitated by appropriate structural adjustment in developed countries. Developing countries should continue the trade-policy reforms and structural adjustment they have undertaken. It is thus urgent to achieve an improvement in market access conditions for commodities, notably through the progressive removal of barriers that restrict imports, particularly from developing countries, of commodity products in primary and processed forms… – Agenda 21
The U.N. is after the sovereignty of your country. The U.N. is after your personal sovereignty and freedom.
Why do they have the Codex Alimenterius? Do you understand that the U.N. feels that you are too stupid to decide what to eat? They feel you are too stupid to decide for yourself what natural herbs, vitamins and minerals you should use for your health?
Already negative trends of the past half century have been accelerated by the recent rules of global trade and finance from global bureaucracies like the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Codex Alimentarius, among others. These institutions have codified policies designed to serve the interests of global agribusiness above all others, while actively undermining the rights of farmers and consumers, as well as the ability of nations to regulate trade across their own borders or to apply standards appropriate to their communities. Rules contained in the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (of the WTO), for example, have empowered global agricultural corporations to seize much of the world’s seed supply, foods and agricultural lands. The globalization of corporate-friendly patent regimes has also directly undermined indigenous and traditional sui generis rights of farmers, for example, to save seeds and protect indigenous varieties they have developed over millennia.
…All human beings on the planet have a fundamental human right to access and/or to produce sufficient food to sustain their lives and communities. All rules and policies should be aligned to recognize this basic right. Every government—local, regional, national, international—is obliged to guarantee this right. It may not be denied in the interests of international commercial or trade processes, or for any other reason. – Manifesto on the Future of Food
The U.N. doesn’t think so. How can you have access to or produce food without farms? How can you have a farm without land?
“Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for the public can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole… Public control of land use is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievement of the long-term objectives of human settlement policies and strategies. - Settlement Planning and Development: A Strategy For Land Policy
The U.N.’s Agenda 21 seeks to eliminate private property. The policies are carried out by local groups and NGO’s under the name of sustainability and other “feel-good” phrases. For example, Michigan is working to eliminate heritage breed pigs, claiming its goal is to eradicate dangerous feral swine, or Executive Order 13575 that establishes the White House Rural Council.
Look for Agenda 21 implementation and indoctrination in your area. Find out if your locality has any ICLEI programs.
The ICLEI is used to carry out Agenda 21 because if they told you what it really was, you would not accept it.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy – fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined -the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” – J. Gary Lawrence, Council on Sustainable Development
Everything is fine. Go back to sleep.
Now wake up!
Barack Hussein Obama is the Manchurian Candidate. He cares more about the rest of the world than he does the United States. He and his masters are not loyal to any nation.
We don’t need borders if we don’t have sovereignty. You can’t call someone an illegal alien if they are a citizen of the world. You’re a racist for insisting they learn your language when they live in your country.
Did you hear Obama’s speech in Germany? It sounded like English, but he was really speaking the Globalist, New World Order language.
Where have I heard that global citizenship, national cooperation talk before?
“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.” -Maurice Strong , Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Can’t you see that Barack Obama does not work for the American people?
“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles and small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Sound familiar? Where else have you heard that statement? Who else do you know, who talks like that?
Are you ready to write some letters and make some phone calls now?
It is time to rid ourselves of treasonous traitors. It is time to withdraw our membership from the U.N. and evict them from their New York City headquarters. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful. If we don’t reclaim our sovereignty, American life will be like the movie, The Hunger Games.
“AGENDA 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth… Effective execution of AGENDA 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society,unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” – Daniel Sitarz
What do you think that means; an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources?
and is there any man so unwise, as not to see, that (considering what has happened) he will suffer no Law to be made here, but such as suit his purpose? We may be as effectually enslaved by the want of laws in America, as by submitting to laws made for us in England (U.N.). After matters are make up (as it is called) can there be any doubt but the whole power of the crown (Secretary-General) will be exerted, to keep this continent as low and humble as possible? Instead of going forward we shall go backward, or be perpetually quarrelling or ridiculously petitioning. We are already greater than the king (Globalist Elitists) wishes us to be, and will he not hereafter endeavor to make us less? To bring the matter to one point. Is the power who is jealous of our prosperity, a proper power to govern us? Whoever says No to this question is an independent… - Common Sense
Hidden in plain sight are the Georgia Guidestones where the goal of reducing the population from seven to one-half a billion people is chiseled in different languages.
What are you going to do about it? Wake up and realize that this is real and it is really happening now. Ask your parents what life was like before. Compare it to now. Can’t you see the progression of martial law and tyranny?
We used to be able to smoke anywhere. Now some people aren’t allowed to smoke in their homes. Kids used to bring their rifles to school on days their gun clubs met. Now parents get arrested if their kid draws a picture of them with a gun. We used to be able to drive down the street with a beer in hand. Now people get arrested for not wearing a seatbelt. The store used to give us bags to carry our groceries home. Now if your city hasn’t banned them; you must pay a tax for a bag. There used to be water fountains everywhere. Not even the parks in my city have fountains.
Do you remember the good-ol’ days when you had habeus corpus, when you could protest politicians, when you could get on an airplane without people touching your children’s genitals and ogling naked pictures of your wife? Do you remember when you were free to control your own health care?
You must fight it. If you weren’t born into the élite, ruling, banking, globalist class, you will never be one of them. You can’t join them. You can’t appease them. You can’t conciliate. You may feel like you’re in the club. They may make you feel welcome and useful, but trust me; when there’s no one else left, they will eventually kill you too.
Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning- and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of Europe absolute: Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore since nothing but blows will do, for God’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child… – Common Sense
Impeach Obama and Panetta. It makes Common Sense.
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia, and Africa, have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.
…To conclude: However strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given, to show, that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration for independence.
… let each of us, hold out to his neighbor the hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line, which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every former dissention. Let the names of Whig (Republican) and Tory (Democrat) be extinct; and let none other be heard among us, than those of a good citizen, an open and resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the RIGHTS of MANKIND and of the FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES OF AMERICA. – Common Sense
- H. Con. Res. 107: Impeach Obama! (freedomfighterusa.wordpress.com)
Are you losing the information war? Not if you’re reading this. If you read The Freedom Fighter, you will get the news that the so-called Mainstream Media will not or can not deliver to you.
I am not a stooge or shill for any government or corporation. I alone decide what information is published to this medium. No one tells me what to write or what not to write.
I will not be a puppet. I may be imprisoned or murdered for defending the first amendment. You may be thrown in jail for reading this.
Another dilemma is whether to target the supply side of the conspiracy theory or the demand side. Should governmental responses be addressed to the suppliers, with a view to persuading or silencing them, or rather be addressed to the mass audience, with a view to inoculating them from pernicious theories? – Conspiracy Theories
I will always fight for knowledge of the truth and I will strive to tell you the truth because; who else will?
Who told you that a resolution was introduced to Impeach the President? Who told you about the Gas Price Spike Act, that if passed will make everything you buy cost more money? Who told you that the DHS/TSA is working on expanding their operations to your neighborhood? Who told you that Obamacare will lead to our priests, pastors, rabbis and imams being imprisoned? Who told you that the First Amendment has effectively been repealed?
Not the people who studied Communications and Journalism in college. Not the people who work in Mainstream Media for large corporations, making six figure and million dollar salaries.
Why didn’t they tell you these things? Did they not know? They have news feeds from AP, Reuters, et al. They have reporters on the beat. They have sources. It is their profession and living.
They knew. Someone decided not to tell you. Someone ordered them not tell you.
We begin by discussing different understandings of the nature of conspiracy theories and different accounts of the kinds of errors made by those who hold them. Our primary claim is that conspiracy theories typically stem not from irrationality or mental illness of any kind but from a “crippled epistemology,” in the form of a sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources. Those who hold conspiracy theories do so because of what they read and hear. In that sense, acceptance of such theories is not irrational from the standpoint of those who adhere to them. There is a close connection, we suggest, between our claim on this count and the empirical association between terrorist behavior and an absence of civil rights and civil liberties.10 When civil rights and civil liberties are absent, people lack multiple information sources, and they are more likely to accept conspiracy theories. – Conspiracy Theories
How ironic. Cass Sunstein wrote Conspiracy Theories so the Government could use it to fight people like me. He says we make up theories based on what we read and hear. What I read is Government documents. What I hear are the words of the politicians themselves. How is that a theory? I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I’m a conspiracy realist.
an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result. - Dictionary.com
Conspiracy theories turn out to be especially hard to undermine or dislodge; they have a self-sealing quality, rendering them particularly immune to challenge… We bracket the most difficult questions here and suggest more intuitively that a conspiracy theory can generally be counted as such if it is an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role… conspiracy theories have some distinctive features, above all because of their self-sealing quality; the very arguments that give rise to them, and account for their plausibility, make it more difficult for outsiders to rebut or even to question them… This account seems to capture the essence of the most prominent and influential conspiracy theories… Of course some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true. – Conspiracy Theories
Sunstein says that we are terrorists if we insist on open, transparent government, if we insist on having true, factual information. He understands the results of an absence of civil rights and multiple sources of information, but instead of restoring civil rights and allowing the free flow of information; people of his ilk want to label us as terrorists and eradicate truth and freedom.
This is not, and is not be intended to be, a general claim that conspiracy theories are unjustified or unwarranted. Much depends on the background state of knowledge producing institutions. If those institutions are generally trustworthy, in part because they are embedded in an open society with a well-functioning marketplace of ideas and free flow of information, then conspiracy theories will generally (which is not to say always) be unjustified. On the other hand, individuals in societies with systematically malfunctioning or skewed institutions of knowledge – say, individuals who live in an authoritarian regime lacking a free press – may have good reason to distrust all or most of the official denials they hear… we will focus on indirect means of undermining such theories, principally by breaking up the closed informational networks that produce such theories… What can government do about conspiracy theories? Among the things it can do, what should it do? We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1)Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. – Conspiracy Theories
Or you could murder them.
Do you remember that? Do you remember all the so-called Conservative show hosts and pundits who laughed and mocked him? Why didn’t they tell you that he was arrested right after asking John Kerry about the Skull and Bones?
Who else asked inappropriate questions about Skull and Bones?
Tim Russert was the only legitimate, credible man in the Mainstream Media. I’m surprised that any politician would appear on Meet the Press because Russert’s bullshit detector was very sensitive and always set on high. He did not have a “crippled epistemology.” He always showed evidence of his claims. Tim Russert died suddenly of a heart attack.
“Barack Obama is a radical. We should not be afraid to say that.” - Andrew Breitbart
Yes we should. Breitbart died of a heart attack the day he planned to release those videos. They said he died of heart attack while he was still on the sidewalk. Breitbart and Russert asked the wrong questions and paid for it with their lives. They both died of heart attacks. Casualties of the Information War.
Imagine a government facing a population in which a particular conspiracy theory is becoming widespread. We will identify two basic dilemmas that recur, and consider how government should respond. The first dilemma is whether to ignore or rebut the theory; the second is whether to address the supply side of conspiracy theorizing by attempting to debias or disable its purveyors, to address the demand side by attempting to immunize third-party audiences from the theory’s effects, or to do both… Government is faced with suppliers of conspiracy theories, and might aim at least in part to persuade, debias, or silence those suppliers. – Conspiracy Theories
Don’t worry. You won’t have a “heart attack” if you believe in the correct, Government approved conspiracies.
Not all false conspiracy theories are harmful; consider the false conspiracy theory, held by many of the younger members of our society, that a secret group of elves, working in a remote location under the leadership of the mysterious “Santa Claus,” make and distribute presents on Christmas Eve. This theory is false, but is itself instilled through a widespread conspiracy of the powerful – parents – who conceal their role in the whole affair. (Consider too the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.) It is an open question whether most conspiracy theories are equally benign; we will suggest that some are not benign at all… If children believe in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny, there is no problem for government to solve… – Conspiracy Theories
So, do you understand? Be good, obedient wards of the State, and keep your mouth shut. Don’t say things that might be offensive. Don’t say things that might not be true.
Why do you want to cause problems for the Government. It is too difficult for them to deal with so much free speech. They must infiltrate too many organizations. They must pay people to put out mis/disinformation to counter yours. If they put out anonymous information, they’ll lose credibility. If they do it themselves, they lose credibility. If they do nothing, they lose credibility. If they try to stop it, they’re evil. If you lie, they must stop you from lying. If you tell the truth, they must stop you from telling the truth. When they carry out nefarious conspiracies, they must keep them secret, but since we live in an open, democratic society, the secret is eventually exposed. If they don’t try to keep it secret, we may not allow them to do it. Why do you want to make it so hard for them to do what they know is best for you? Why don’t you just be a good citizen, and stop consuming alternative news sources? Why don’t you stop asking questions and just STFU and be a good controllable citizen?
Except for CNBC, I don’t watch TV. The only newspaper I read is The Washington Examiner, I listen to talk radio all day every day, left and right-wing. Before I started writing this magazine, I believed the conservative talk show hosts were credible. I’ve lost respect for many of them because of their lack of coverage of news that is truly important.
The newspeople I give credence to are: Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Lyndon Larouche, Jesse Ventura, Hal Lindsey Coast to Coast AM, and Midnight Trucking Radio.
Who do you think is winning and losing the Information War?
Do you feel down? Depressed? Angry? How about your kids? Do they ever act up or rebel?
Do you want to talk about it?
Do you want to talk to the Government about it? The Government cares about you, you know. They just want you and your kids to feel and do better. We’re here to help. Let us help you. Come talk to us. Tell us all about how sad, depressed and angry you feel. Let your kids tell us why they act disruptive and disobedient. Let your kids tell us why they feel rage and what they want to do about it.
We’re the Government. We just want to help you. We’ll pay for your transportation to our laboratories and clinics. We’ll give you free drugs and pay you to let us poke and prod and experiment on you. We’ll give you a free cell phone with free service (to track your movements with).
How do you feel about the second amendment?
Do you own a gun? If not, do you think you’ll ever want to get one? Will your children ever need or want a gun?
Be careful who you tell your personal problems too. In the wrong hands; that information could be used against you.
Maybe it should. Every “crazy”, or depressed person is an inevitable murderer, right?
Appendix I Identifying prohibited purchasers:
The mentally ill
The Gun Control Act as amended prohibits the sale
of a firearm to several categories of potential
purchasers, including persons who have been
adjudicated as a mental defective or have been
committed to a mental institution.
Regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF) define this mental
health category as –
* individuals who have been adjudicated as a mental
defective, meaning –
“(a) A determination by a court, board,
commission, or other lawful authority that a person,
as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, or
mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease:
(1) Is a danger to himself or to others; or
(2) Lacks the mental capacity to contract or manage
his own affairs.
Apart from the category of adjudicated commitments,
the mental health information that is checked during
investigations of firearm purchasers varies among the
California included in its check of mental health
records information on individuals who have
communicated serious threats of violence to a
licensed therapist. - Department of Justice
You don’t need to be a raving lunatic, dragged away and committed to an institution by men in white coats to be disqualified from gun ownership. A board, commission, or other lawful person or in California, a licensed therapist can declare you to be incompetent to possess a firearm.
Be careful who you talk to. There is a covert war against the second amendment going on.
It is shameful what a bunch of weak, feminized, sleepwalking, pushover sheep the American people have become. Obama said we get the government we deserve. Did you hear the attorney general say that Madison Avenue makes him buy stuff he doesn’t need? We deserve Eric Holder.
My father used to bring his gun to school on days the school gun club met. Now people get arrested for drawing pictures of guns. Eric Holder said our attitudes toward guns need to be changed the way our attitudes toward smoking were. I remember when kids brought Styrofoam cups to school to spit in. They had to chew tobacco in class because smoking wasn’t allowed inside. Now smokers are treated like lepers. They are lucky tobacco isn’t a dangerous controlled substance.
(1) the NICS Prohibited Persons Index (NICS Index),
containing records of persons prohibited by the Gun
Control Act to purchase a firearm — those
dishonorably discharged from the armed services,
persons who have renounced U.S. citizenship,
mental defectives, controlled substance abusers,
and illegal/unlawful aliens – Department of Justice
Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but
their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. - Romans 16: 17-18
Did you have a happy and great International Woman’s Day? Did you have many discussions about the current Republican war against women?
With her much fair speech she caused him to yield, with the flattering of her lips she forced him. He goeth after her straightway, as an ox goeth to the slaughter, or as a fool to the correction of the stocks; Till a dart strike through his liver; as a bird hasteth to the snare, and knoweth not that it is for his life. – Proverbs 7: 21-23
The war against women is the war against all Americans. Let’s pay attention to the man behind the curtain.
Drug test? I know many people have to be drunk to get the courage to board a plane. I suppose a six-year-old terrorist would have to be high on hard drugs for the courage to blow herself up on a plane.
“There has to be some sacrifice and some balance when it comes to security at the airport.” – Stupid Sheep-Man
Ben Franklin said that since you are willing to give up a little liberty for a little security; you deserve neither and will lose both.
What kind of father are you? You’re supposed to teach your daughter to not let anyone touch her.
Only 110,000 complaints, so everything is fine then. Go back to sleep.
They acted professionally. It would be professional if they were nurses. they must have thought a woman that old would be ready to die and willing to blow herself up for Al-Qaeda.
They said she could throw the milk in the trash. What if she did that, got on the plane and left, and the milk exploded in the trash can? Smart.
It’s enough to make you break down and cry.
Why is she so upset? Did they make her drink her own breast milk?
Maybe she is experiencing psychological distress from aborting her two-year old baby. Here’s a paper from the Journal of Medical Ethics extolling the virtues of post-birth abortion. It is difficult to be a woman in this world. The Republicans are waging war against women, if you don’t get pregnant; your ovaries will explode, but no one will pay for your birth control. If you get birth control pills, you’ll die. If you get pregnant, you’ll die. If you have an abortion you’ll suffer psychological distress. If you give the baby up for adoption, you’ll suffer even more psychological distress. If you survive all this and grow old; your doctor will murder you.
There’s a war against women, but it isn’t being waged by the Republicans. It isn’t being waged specifically against women either. Someone is waging war against all of us.
It doesn’t matter what you are: Left, Right, Republican, Democrat, Male, Female, Black, or White. If you are not one of the Elites involved in the planning and implementation of this war; then the war is against you.
Or is the war against children in Uganda? You want to talk about Kony 2012? Kony is right here in America. CPS is run by child molesters and killers who confiscate children without cause for profit and ritual sacrifices.
Why else would the Communist Chinese, renowned for infanticide, disappearing dissidents, and organ harvesting, want to emulate our laws?
China is preparing to overhaul a key criminal law amid public confusion – and some dread – over whether the government is about to give police the legal authority to disappear people.
At issue is an amendment to the criminal procedure law that would allow police to secretly detain suspects for months without informing their families. The effect would be to legalize the secret detentions police have increasingly been using against political critics, activist lawyers and other dissidents. – The Seattle Times
China has mobile execution vans, yet they’re emulating our laws now.
Maybe the war is in Syria. Syria? You want to talk about Bashar al-Assad? Assad is our president.
When the Government comes to confiscate your home and property and ship you off to a re-education camp for forced labor, and the people rise up, take up arms and start fighting back; how do you think our Government is going to react?
Homs? no, Omaha.
- Ok to Lie to Patients, if Abortion is Involved (aleksandreia.com)
- Are US Republicans waging a war on women? – Toronto Star (thestar.com)
- DAY 19: The tide is changing (deaconjohnspace.wordpress.com)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Every time Congress meets they take away more of our liberties.
March 8, 2012 H.R. 347 was signed by the constitutional law professor, Barack Obama. It is cleverly worded to make perfect sense, but there are some parts I have a problem with.
Don’t we already have enough laws? Isn’t it already illegal to trespass or commit violent acts against other people? Why do we need duplicate, superfluous laws?
They use the law to break the law.
H.R. 347 states:
‘‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive
conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds… shall be punished…
‘‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area—
‘‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance; and
‘‘(2) the term ‘other person protected by the Secret Service’ means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title or by Presidential memorandum, when such person has not declined such protection.” – Government Printing Office
This affects both sides of the political spectrum. The side that gets the worse treatment is the side opposite of the party in power at the time.
The law says that you must knowingly break it. You must trespass with the intent of disruption.
This law outlaws protests. Not all protesters are trespassers. All protests aren’t premeditated.
How could Joe Wilson know beforehand that he would need to call Obama a liar? It doesn’t matter though. He disrupted a Government function. The man with the, “What Bill?” sign committed a premeditated act of disorderly conduct and deserves to be Joe Wilson’s cell-mate.
Do you remember this incident?
How many “hate crimes” did you hear committed by the yelling of the “N” word? None. Doesn’t matter. They are all guilty of obstructing and impeding ingress or egress to or from restricted buildings or grounds.
Newt Gingrich and I frequent the same restaurant. The last time I saw him there; he was accompanied by Secret Service. The restaurant isn’t a restricted building. Dinner isn’t a Government function. Many people walked up to him and spoke with him, but if this law was in effect then; anyone who debated with him or held up a vote Romney sign in the dining room would be a felon.
This is just the beginning. Don’t think that they aren’t working on a way to extend this law to protests and dissent everywhere. They won’t stop until they stop us from saying bad things about them, writing contrary opinions about what they do, or thinking ill thoughts about them.
They need you to stay home and not interrupt them when they pass unconstitutional laws like this designed to install tyranny and reduce the population to just them and their ilk. They don’t need you exposing their lies and waking people up to the truth. These people are smarter and better than you. They know what’s best for you and they don’t need your interference while they’re controlling your lives, OK?
Just be a good citizen and STFU!
Trust me. I do not seek to titillate or entertain. This is important and very serious. I understand that good, upright people are repulsed by the thought of bestiality, but this is the status quo of our nation and I am going to tell you what it portends for our future.
The Government says that bestiality wasn’t legalized for the military. That would be ridiculous, right? Many people were upset about the repeal of DADT. Some believe that if we are permissive of homosexuality, ie., gay marriage, open gays in the military; we’ll have to allow all types of other inappropriate behavior: Bestiality, polygamy, pædophelia, incest, marriage to inanimate objects… The Godless Heathens say it isn’t true. I say that you allowed, supported, and promoted these abominations and now men are marrying pillows, and $10,000 love dolls.
Bestiality has been removed from the UCMJ. The part of the code that outlawed bestiality also outlawed sodomy so they had to remove it to allow gays to openly serve.
“For their part, Pentagon officials say the deletion of bestiality is a legal technicality and does not represent any fundamental change in the military’s moral code for servicemembers (and service animals).” – Military.com
They say this doesn’t make it legal because there are other laws that a soldier can be prosecuted under if he or she is caught having sex with an animal.
One can be arrested in Little Rock for saying (are can says) because it is illegal to mispronounce the word Arkansas in that state. It is written in the books. One can not be arrested in Wichita for saying (can saw) because they have nothing written outlawing the mispronunciation of the word Kansas.
If you’ve read enough of The Freedom Fighter, you know that I, like the end of The Wizard of Oz, pull back the curtain and expose the man that they say to pay no attention to.
This isn’t about gays in the military or weirdos having sex with animals.
The same people who criticize the leaders of Iran for taking measures to hasten the prophet coming out of the well are doing things to bring on the Apocalypse themselves.
But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. – Matthew 24:37
What were the days of Noah like?
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose… There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. – Genesis 6: 1-4
I don’t agree with him on everything, but this man, Representative Walter Jones, is a patriot.
Representative Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012.
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution. – Library of Congress
Let’s talk about the Korean “Police Action.” The saying is, those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. I think the saying is wrong because history is going to repeat itself. People study history, and when we try to tell you that it is repeating; you don’t want to take heed. History has already repeated.
Much documentation exists to show that the Korean conflict was the result of careful planning by men whose control extended to both the United States and the Soviet Union. This conflict began with the founding of the United Nations at the end of World War II. The name “United Nations” had been imprinted in the mind of the American public during the war when it referred to the countries allied against Germany, Italy, and Japan…
It was secret protocols at Yalta that agreed to partition Korea along the Thirty-eighth Parallel and allowed the Soviet Union and China control over the North.
Such action had been contemplated a year earlier. An April 1944 article in Foreign Affairs called for “a trusteeship for Korea… assumed not by a particular country, but by a group of Powers, say, the United States, Great Britain, China and Russia.” The CFR leadership realized that the American public might not agree to war should such a “trusteeship” be challenged and began to develop a rationale for intervention.
An internal 1944 CFR memo stated that the “sovereignty fetish” and the “difficulty… arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war” might In- oumim-il willi “the contention treaty would overrule this barrier… our participation in such police action as might be recommended by [an] international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war.”
“It is not unreasonable to say that there never would have been a Communist regime in North Korea, nor would there ever have been a Korean War, had American negotiations [led by CFR members] and lend-lease shipments not brought the USSR into the Pacific theater,” commented Perloff…
Russian commanders were running the conflict on both sides. Under the agreement at Yalta and due to their supplying North Korea with military hardware and technology, Soviet military officers were largely in control of the war. Author Epperson cited a Pentagon press release which identified two Soviet officers as being in charge of movements across the Thirty-eighth Parallel. One, a General Vasilev, actually was overheard giving the order to attack on June 25,1951.
General Vasilev’s chain of command reached from Korea to Moscow to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs. At this same time, General MacArthur’s chain of command went through President Truman to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs, an office held at that time by Russian Constantine Zinchenko. This meant that Soviet officers were overseeing the North Korean war strategy while reporting back to a fellow Soviet officer in the same UN office that coordinated the allied war effort.
“In effect, the Communists were directing both sides of the war,” wrote author Griffin. What past conspiracy authors failed to consider was the evidence that Communist Russia was financed and controlled from the beginning by the inner circle of America’s modern secret societies…
MacArthur, noting that for the first time in its military history, the United States had failed to achieve victory, was later to state, “Never before has this nation been engaged in mortal combat with a hostile power without military objective, without policy other than restrictions governing operations, or indeed without even formally recognizing a state of war.” This set a precedent in the United States which continues to haunt us to this day.
But was there again a hidden purpose to this seemingly pointless conflict, one that reached into the upper circles of the secret societies? A 1952 Foreign Affairs article explained,
“The meaning of our experience in Korea as I see it, is that we have made historic progress toward the establishment of a viable system of collective security.”
So Korea was another step forward in realizing the CFR goals of one-world government backed by a implied military command as with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). CFR member Dean Acheson later admitted, “The only reason I told the President to fight in Korea was to validate NATO.” – Jim Marrs
Failure to prevent a slaughter would have disregarded America’s “important strategic interest in preventing Qaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him”…The writ of the United Nations Security Council would have been shown to be little more than empty words, crippling that institution’s future credibility to uphold global peace and security.
The President explained in his March 21, 2011 report to Congress that the use of military force in Libya serves important U.S. interests in preventing instability in the Middle East and preserving the credibility and effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council.
… may justify use of military force by the President. In 2004, for example, we found adequate legal authority for the deployment of U.S. forces to Haiti based on national interests in protecting the lives and property of Americans in the country, preserving “regional stability,” and maintaining the credibility of United Nations Security Council mandates.
… and maintaining the credibility of the UNSC.
In our view, the combination of at least two national interests that the President reasonably determined were at stake here—preserving regional stability and supporting the UNSC’s credibility…
The second important national interest implicated here, which reinforces the first, is the longstanding U.S. commitment to maintaining the credibility of the United Nations Security Council and the effectiveness of its actions to promote international peace and security. Since at least the Korean War, the United States government has recognized that “‘[t]he continued existence of the United Nations as an effective international organization is a paramount United States interest.
Here, the UNSC’s credibility and effectiveness as an instrument of global peace and stability were at stake in Libya…
NATO and the UN are controlled by the international bankers who are also our President’s puppet masters.
Dean Acheson said the only reason we were in Korea was to validate the UN. The word, credibility, appears seven times in the Authority To Use Military Force In Libya paper.
Why isn’t anyone talking about validating the U.S. Constitution, the credibility of the U.S. Congress and it’s legislation?
Barack Obama must have thought that it would be easier to get forgiveness than permission. Just like Panetta said, they started the foreign operation and then told, not asked, Congress what was going on. Two days after the invasion he said that the UN gave him authority to intervene in Libya.
Barack Obama has committed treason by usurping his powers and congressional authority to international organizations. The United States is an independent nation. We the People are Sovereign.
Impeach Barack Hussein Obama now!
Impeach Leon Panetta!
The precedent has been set. They want to circumvent the authority of the People represented in Congress and now intervene in Syria which will result in Al-Qaeda ruling that nation.
We were paranoid conspiracy theorists when we tried to tell you that the Arab Spring was a false flag operation. We told you that it wasn’t a movement to install democratic republics in the Middle East and North Africa. You didn’t want to believe that we were helping Al-Qaeda take over Egypt and Libya.
Do you want to do the same in Syria? Those who want the New World Order and One-World Government do.
Did you read above about how U.S. soldiers were taking orders from Russian commanders. Do you understand that Al-Qaeda is the CIA? Who is really commanding our soldiers in Afghanistan? If history repeats itself; we are not fighting a real enemy but ourselves to benefit the world’s central banks.
We can not allow one man to have the power to declare war. We can not allow the UN or NATO to supplant our sovereignty.
H. Con. Res. 107 has no co-sponsors. Tell your Representatives to support Walter Jones and co-sponsor this resolution. Tell your Representatives to Impeach the traitors!
If you don’t know who your Representatives are or how to contact them; go to my contact page and give me your zip code. I will tell you who your Representative is and how to contact him or her.
Stand up for our country. Fight for our Independence and Sovereignty.
My WordPress stats page reports that the search term, is Sandra Fluke a lesbian, is very popular today. I’ve heard the rumors. I don’t have proof, but I have this picture.
What do you think? Does she look like the kind of woman who wants to be a man’s wife and a loving mother? Gentlemen, does she look approachable? Would you go up to her and ask her out? Would you hire her to be your lawyer? I love God-Fearing, conservative women not these short-haired, pants-wearing FemiNazis. They are saying the Republicans are waging war against women. I say that Sandra Fluke is waging war against women for three years now. You might think that doesn’t make sense because she claims to be an advocate for women’s reproductive rights. Eleanor Holmes Norton said she represents women. The labels are meant to mislead you. Women’s Liberation, Women’s Rights, NOW, et al are not for the things that are truly good for women. They are trying to convince you that the issue is health and that birth control is healthy for women. The truth is that birth control pills cause deadly blood clots. The agenda is present even in this article. WebMD tells you the truth of the matter, but makes sure to also say that pregnancy carries more risk than the pill. After five decades of these organizations and movements; what is the condition of the participants? These movements have not resulted in improved conditions or better health for women. These women are not happier than their grandmothers.
“If many of you were to tear up all your “britches,” you would have to wear a barrel to the store to get something else to wear. The way you look in them, a barrel would fit you perfectly, too! There’s not a man in this room tonight who wonders why it’s wrong for a woman to wear slacks, unless he thinks it’s okay to examine a woman like you would a pig at a county fair. You know it’s true!” – Pastor Jack Hyles
Fluke’s ilk are like pigs; the animal and the countries:
Portugal Ireland Greece Spain – I didn’t make up the acronym.
Do you understand that the these nations and the people lived like pigs and that is why they are suffering now. This is why the suffering will soon come to America.
Pig’s in the mud When he tires
Pig’s in zen…
Pig is nude Unashamed…
Talkin bout the pig
Pig mounts sow
When he’s wound
Pig eats shit
But only when he hungers
Pig’s in zen
Oh, I know about war
I know about pain and suffering and being cold
But I just wanna f!@#$
The pig is led to the slaughter
This he says
Is the price some pay
For a simple life
How he feels
Thats proof for him
- Jane’s Addiction
“Gasoline prices are on the rise and Republicans are licking their chops.” Are the Republicans licking their chops? Let’s see who really is.
I see the vultures circling.
Steven Chu said, “we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.” and then Obama appointed him Energy secretary.
If you put someone in charge of energy who said that he wants energy prices to rise; when those prices rise; how can you say that your opposition is licking their chops?
$12/gallon? Isn’t that too much? How will we handle that?
But it still costs $50 to fill my Chevy Voltswagon™.
Oh, a gradual adjustment.
Even with a gradual rise in prices; $12/gallon still sounds too expensive. What’s wrong with building the Keystone XL Pipeline? What’s wrong with drill baby drill? Why can’t we drill in ANWR, the California coast, and the Gulf of Mexico?
“The American People aren’t stupid. They know that’s not a plan…That’s a bumper sticker.That’s not a strategy to solve our energy challenge…You know there are no quick fixes to this problem. You know we can’t just drill our way to lower gas prices.” – Barack Obama
So, Mr. President; what’s the plan?
Algae? Will it work?
I want to help too, Mr. President. Here’s an energy source you may have overlooked: Human body fat.
“According to a much-quoted 2009 press briefing from the Centers for Disease Control, American adults collectively are hauling around at least 4.6 billion extra pounds of fat. That’s the equivalent of four trillion BTUs of energy — an impressive number, but what does it mean in practical terms? The following may give a sense. The same amount of energy would be contained in:
700,000 barrels of crude oil, or
35 million gallons of gasoline, or
nearly 15 freight trains loaded with coal.” – The Straight Dope
From where are we going to get our energy; unicorn dreams, children’s laughter, fairy dust? Just don’t make me do this:
I can fix everything I own, except my iPhone, but I’ll eventually learn how that works too. I was doing routine maintenance on my computer when I bent a pin on the processor. I immediately got on my iPhone and ordered a new one.
It took too long to arrive and I missed last Sunday’s deadline to publish The Freedom Fighter. I tried my best to write last week’s edition on my iPhone, but it is not a suitable alternative.
The Freedom Fighter is back and I am pleased to say that the Department of Homeland Security didn’t shut me down. Not yet.
Since 2010 The DHS has been surveilling and collecting information on, “U.S. and foreign private sector officials and spokespersons who make public statements or provide public updates; 5) names of anchors, newscasters, or on-scene reporters who are known or identified as reporters in their post or article or who use traditional and/or social media in real-time to keep their audience situationally aware and informed;” – DHS
Is all this needed to say that DHS may look up numbers in the phonebook? Was the DHS allowed to read a blog, newspaper, or watch a news broadcast before these rules were written?
I think the DHS wants to make sure you keep sleepwalking. Why do they need a dossier of names of those who keep you situationally aware and informed?
Andrew Breitbart was known for making people situationally aware and informed. The information he presented has caused people in the government to lose their jobs.
Was this announcement at the 2012 CPAC the final straw for the Obama administration? I’m sure they wish they had the SpeechJammer that night.
Imagine how this device is going to affect freedom of speech and situational awareness.
Was Breitbart’s PII collected by the DHS? Was he at the top of the hit list?
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America states:
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident… That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among, Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness… when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a Government… – Declaration of Independence
Why is the DHS so concerned about the press? We are supposed to have freedom of the press. The Declaration of Independence says it is our duty to install a just government. If the Government was right; I don’t think it would fight us when we expose its corruption and seek to correct it.
The press should not be a threat to a just, righteous and moral Government.
- Homeland Security Officials Caught Hiding Online Spying Program from Congress (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. – Matthew 7:15
What kind of fruit has Obama produced?
1. In 1997, Obama voted in the Illinois Senate against SB 230, a bill designed to prevent partial-birth abortions.
2. On March 30, 2001, Obama was the only Illinois senator who rose to speak against a bill that would have protected babies who survived late term labor-induced abortion. Obama rose to object that if the bill passed, and a nine-month-old fetus survived a late-term labor-induced abortion was deemed to be a person who had a right to live, then the law would “forbid abortions to take place.” Obama further explained the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow somebody to kill a child, so if the law deemed a child who survived a late-term labor-induced abortion had a right to live, “then this would be an anti-abortion statute.”
3. In 2006, Obama introduced a bill to expand contraceptive services for low-income women.
4. In 2007, Obama co-sponsored a bill to ensure access to and funding for contraception: A bill to expand access to preventive health care services that help reduce unintended pregnancy.
Source: On The Issues
5. 2010: Obama spent $23 million U.S. tax dollars to extort Kenyans into legalizing free abortions in their new constitution.
Source: Life News
6. 2012: As President of the United States, Obama is mandating that churches and religious organizations that provide health insurance to their employees, provide contraceptives, and abortions free of charge.
Source: The White House
Has Obama been to the Bohemian Grove? I’m unable to confirm his attendance. Very few of our Presidents since 1932 have not attended before being elected. So many have gone; one could surmise that attendance is a prerequisite for the highest office. He was in California during the rituals before the 2008 election.
And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech… – Leviticus 18:21
…Whosoever…that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death… And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name. And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not: Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people. – Leviticus 20:2-5
He would fit in well at the Bohemian Grove with his blood lust for infanticide. They say that their annual human sacrifice is a mock ritual, Obama’s human sacrifices are very real and do not conform to Christian, Jewish, or Islamic doctrine.
It doesn’t matter if Obama has been there or not. By supporting and promoting abortion, he is allowing the children to be passed through the fire to appease the idol, Molech.
This is the Jewish and Christian doctrine. What about Islam?
And do not kill your children for fear of poverty. We provide for them and for you. Indeed, their killing is ever a great sin. And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way. And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right. And whoever is killed unjustly – We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law]. – Surat Al-’Isrā’ 17:31-33
Say, “Come, I will recite what your Lord has prohibited to you. [He commands] that you not associate anything with Him, and to parents, good treatment, and do not kill your children out of poverty; We will provide for you and them. And do not approach immoralities – what is apparent of them and what is concealed. And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden [to be killed] except by [legal] right. This has He instructed you that you may use reason.” – Surat Al-’An`ām 6:151
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors. – Surat Al-Mā’idah 5:32
Rick Santorum was mocked and ridiculed for bringing home his recently deceased newborn son from the hospital. Of course people who prefer loveless sex, homo sex, and abortions for convenience wouldn’t understand why he would do that. These are the people who would equate Michael Vick to Hitler for killing a dog. These are the people who will say abortion is safer than giving birth.
Who are the real cave-men?
Most people believe that the civilizations of the past were much more ignorant and violent than we.
Before Margaret Sanger; were abortions done at today’s frequency and done for convenience?
I saw on TV, an archaeologist unearth evidence of ancient prostitutes having frequent abortions.
Archaeologists of the future will unearth the same evidence from our enlightened era of Google and travel to Mars.
That is; if we have a future.
This void of natural love and affection, this disrespect for human life is more proof that we are certainly living in the last days.
- Heroic News: “Pro life protesters arrested at White House over HHS mandate” plus 7 more (deaconjohnspace.wordpress.com)
- -Baptists on Obama’s Mandate: We’d Rather Go to Jail and Pay Fines (answersforthefaith.com)
I guess the media had more important things to tell us. Why did they make such a big deal about some women walking out of the hearing Thursday, but not a word about this?
About the walkout: Why does it matter that there were no women slated to testify? Gone With the Wind starred no left-handed, lesbian Pygmies, but it is still a good movie, right?
The House Hearing was intended for religious leaders to testify about religious freedom and the effect the new health care laws would have on it. A majority of religious leaders are men. That is why there were no women present.
For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. – 1 Corinthians 14:34
Sorry ladies. Rules is rules.
These men were there because they object to the government mandating them to provide and pay for products and services they find offensive and sinful. Most churches that have women leaders aren’t the ones that object to abortions, and pre/extramarital, and homo sex. Those churches probably have no problem with this kind of government overreach.
You shouldn’t have left, Speaker Pelosi. You missed your chance to tell the oppressive, Bible-thumping, chauvinistic males how much you would love sending them to jail.
How far away are we from this? When all the religious leaders with unorthodox loyalties to the Bible, Torah, Quran, etc are imprisoned for thought-crimes; we’ll have to use computer simulated Pastors, Priests, and Rabbis.
The confession booth will no longer be private of course. The NSA will be listening to your prayers to make sure you’re not thinking about pricking holes in your condoms, or not taking your birth control pills. Can’t have unauthorized procreation because children will contribute to overpopulation and global-warming.
This isn’t about contraceptives or abortions. This isn’t about churches or freedom of religion. This is only about the Government having complete control over every minute aspect of your life and body.
Those responsible for doing this are obligated to tell you what they are doing to you. That is why they wrote their plans in Stone:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature. (sic)
You may not be religious and not care about this controversy. If we lose this battle; you will lose too.
It’s like how they say to do when you first walk into a prison: Find the biggest, meanest, toughest man there, walk up to him and knock him out in front of everybody. If you do this; no one else in the jail will dare to bother you.
To the Government; the church is that man who must be knocked out and made an example of. If they can gain this kind of power over the church; the rest of us will fall like dominoes.
- City Officials, Religious Leaders Want Mayor To Obey Court On Religion And Schools (newyork.cbslocal.com)
- Detroit Columnist Calls for Sterilants in Drinking Water to Curb Poverty Numbers (Infowars.com)
So I see this poster on the bus.
You’re probably thinking,”big deal.” That’s because I had to take the picture with my phone on a moving bus. I couldn’t photograph the whole poster and make it clear also.
What you can’t see is that the man is standing in front of a church. He is standing in front of his church and telling us that he gets AIDS tests because he cares about his congregation.
What does that mean?
1. He is sexually active. People who aren’t don’t need AIDS tests.
2. He is having sex with the people in his congregation. He said he asks for the test because he cares about them. If he wasn’t having sex with his congregation; he wouldn’t get the test out of concern for them.
3. He is the Pastor of the church. That’s the connotation I get when he says, “my congregation.”
4. The District Department of Health couldn’t confirm that he is the Pastor of the church, but they did tell The Freedom Fighter that he is definitely a real person, not an actor or model, and the message is his.
Wow. Is that kind of sex life the Bible teaches us to have?
It’s surely the doctrine the Government wants the church to preach.
The ACA is requiring employers who provide health insurance to provide contraception, abortions, and all types of reproductive health services to their employees free of charge. This includes religious employers and organizations such as hospitals and soup kitchens.
Are you ready to see a bowl of Barack Obama Condoms next to the holy water?
Now slow down on calling me out for saying that churches are required to pay for this sinful stuff. I know Obama “compromised” and let the churches off by requiring the insurance companies to provide these products and services free of charge instead of the employers.
Have you ever been told the magicians secret? They keep your eyes occupied with much action by one hand while the other hand you’re not watching is doing the part of the trick they don’t want you to see.
Did he fool you with that one? Not if you have a basic understanding of business and economics.
There is no free-lunch. Call your health insurance agency and tell them you want your toothpaste, deodorant, tampons, etc. to be covered by them with no co-pay.
Every human being has sex. If a person is not having sex, he wants to be having sex. The global contraceptive industry is expected to earn $13.5 billion a year by 2015. – bcc Research
These things cannot be produced and brought to market without someone paying for them. If the church is offering the insurance plan; that means they are subsidizing a portion of the price of the plan. Even with the burden put on the insurance companies; the churches will still be paying for contraceptives and abortions.
You already know this of course. If you’re reading this, you probably consume news from other sources also; non State-Controlled Media sources that also tell the truth, and they have all said the same thing all this week.
This is what they haven’t said:
They know that the churches know that regardless of the compromise; by complying and continuing to offer health insurance to their employees, they will still be financing sin. They know the churches won’t accept this and will simply stop offering health insurance.
I don’t know what America’s share of that $13.5 billion a year is, but whatever it is it’s too much for anyone to give away. With the insurance companies required to provide contraceptives, abortions, and preventive care free of charge; they’ll have no choice but to either raise the premiums to a point of being unaffordable or go out of business.
The government wants a monopoly on health insurance and health care. This is just one their ways of getting it.
Keep this in mind during this church condom controversy. Watch how their plan to snare us all in their trap unfolds. Remember that their goal is to ruin the health insurance industry so that you have nowhere to go but to them.
We are very lucky that the ACA has not yet gone into full effect. They delayed it because the uproar over things like this and everything else coming down the pike would ensure Obama’s defeat in this year’s election. It is a fortunate thing that this year is an election year. We have an opportunity to elect a Congress that will write a bill to repeal the ACA. Not repeal and replace. Repeal. We have an opportunity to elect a President that will sign that bill into law thus restoring our right to control over our own finances, bodies and health care.
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan (cbsnews.com)
Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, suggests the Egyptians, while forming their new constitution, should look for inspiration in South Africa’s constitution, not America’s.
“Egyptians should be aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II… I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a Constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the Constitution of South Africa… That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, had an independent judiciary. … It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done. Much more recent than the U.S. Constitution.” – Ruth Bader Ginsburg
She thinks the Constitution is too old. The pot calling the kettle black. If the Constitution is too old; then she is too old for her job. I’m surprised she stayed awake long enough to do the interview. I’ve only seen her nodding off at State of the Union Addresses like an old person at church.
She’s not the only one that has a problem with the Constitution. Our Constitution has too many negative rights according to the President of the United States.
“If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.” - Barack Obama
Didn’t these people take an oath to uphold the Constitution?
What’s so good about South Africa’s constitution?
Their preamble states:
We therefore, through our freely elected representatives, adopt this Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic
One must dig in all the way to article VI of the U.S. Constitution to read:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in…shall be the supreme Law of the Land…
Blah blah this, Olde English words that… The supremacy of the Constitution is at the end of the document and not written in understandable plain English.
No wonder it gets laughed at and trampled on. So many people today have ADD and won’t read that far into an archaic document. Our legislators routinely pass laws they haven’t read.
South Africa constitution:
12. Freedom and security of the person
2.Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right
a. to make decisions concerning reproduction;
b. to security in and control over their body…
Read between the lines: Abortions for women of any age, at any stage of pregnancy, for any reason whatsoever, free of charge.
No person shall be…deprived of life…without due process of law…
The Founding Fathers had a respect for life. Ginsburg and Obama want to murder babies, and they want our tax money to pay for it.
South Africa constitution:
15. Freedom of religion, belief and opinion
1.Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.
1. Religious observances may be conducted at state or state-aided institutions, provided that
a.those observances follow rules made by the appropriate public authorities;
they are conducted on an equitable basis; and
b. attendance at them is free and voluntary.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…
Who says, thereof? It’s too hard to understand. Many people today believe this means separation of church and state. They think this means prayer isn’t allowed in school or the Ten Commandments can’t be displayed at a courthouse. South Africa’s constitution is clear. Franklin Graham can speak at the Pentagon as long as the event is equitable, free and voluntary.
South Africa Constitution:
a.This section does not prevent legislation recognising
i. marriages concluded under any tradition, or a system of religious, personal or family law; or
ii. systems of personal and family law under any tradition, or adhered to by persons professing a particular religion.
Does this law allow gay marriage? It appears to, if, gay marriage is traditional, or a system of religious, personal, or family law. If the couple can profess to be a part of a gay religion; it looks like they can marry in South Africa.
Gay South Africans: Let me know how that works out for you.
Section 1. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of…liberty…without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section. 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State…
Section. 2. The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States…
The Constitution doesn’t mention marriage, but if any combination of people, animals or objects manages to get a pastor to perform the service and obtain a marriage license; the Government is compelled to recognize it.
South Africa Constitution:
No citizen may be deprived of citizenship.
Section 1. All Persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Who says words like, wherein? Like I said before; the language is too hard to understand. People that don’t read anyway aren’t going to read the whole Constitution and then the Amendments too. Amendment XIV is halfway through the Amendment section. I don’t believe Joe Lieberman and Charles Dent are aware of Amendment XIV. If so; would they have written the Enemy Expatriation Act?
South Africa Constitution:
21. Freedom of movement and residence
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of movement.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
There is nothing wrong with our Constitution. We only need to read it. Was Amendment IV read by those who created the TSA and allowed them to keep a woman off a flight because there were no female agents there to feel her up?
South Africa Constitution:
27. Health care, food, water and social security
1. Everyone has the right to have access to
a. health care services, including reproductive health care;
b. sufficient food and water; and
c. social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependants, appropriate social assistance.
2. The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.
Read between the lines:
Free. Cradle to Grave government support of every aspect of personal life.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg took an oath to uphold the United States’ Constitution, but she seems to be showing loyalty to Canada’s and South Africa’s. She lauds South Africa’s constitution because it contains so many Human Rights. The truth is; much of it and all the post WWII constitutions are based on ours.
South Africa’s constitution says that housing, health care, food, water, social security, and education are rights.
The Declaration of Independence states:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. – That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, – That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…
Rights are given to us by God, not Man. A man can take away your rights, but he cannot give them to you. A right is not something that another man can give you. How can a man give you life? How can a man make you happy?
South Africans, while you’re enjoying all the free stuff you have a “right” to; remember this:
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.” – Gerald Ford
Elections have consequences. Ginsburg was appointed by Bill Clinton. I’m glad I didn’t fall for his “cool” act; playing sax on Arsenio Hall and serial marital infidelities. Now we have Obama and Obamacare. The legality of the ACA is going to be decided by Ginsburg and the Supreme Court.
Is she going to go with South Africa and say that health care is a right, even though to receive it, it must be taken from someone else, or will her decision be guided by the Constitution she swore to uphold?
Fined $300,000 and run out-of-town. Married three times and owes Tiffany’s 500 large…
Someone asked me today; if I would let Newt Gingrich handle my money and investments? He said his golf buddies wouldn’t let him run their Wendy’s.
The best President would be a man born and raised in the United States. An educated, civic man who has managed a successful business and is ready to commit to serving this country by upholding the constitution.
A man with these characteristics will be loyal to the country and obey our law if his motivation for doing it is, service. It should be obvious that a man who spends 25% or more, of his short time on Earth, to politics, is a career politician.
A career politician will do whatever his puppet masters need done. A true Patriot would do it for service. People like George Washington believed that the best government would include people who, after becoming prosperous and successful enough from their productivity, would be able to retire from their work to represent the people.
A true civic patriot would be a successful man who is either a successful business-man from supplying high-quality American goods and services to the Capitalist, Free-Market/and or a Veteran.
If that man served this country and shot/and or got shot at by an enemy of the
Constitution; it would be easier for me to find him well-qualified for the job.
The President is Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
The movie Top Gun is the life of John Mcain. He was shot down over the Godless jungles of Vietnam where they held him prisoner for almost six years.
George HW Bush was shot down in the middle of the Pacific Ocean he was rescued
by a submarine right before being captured by the enemy. Do you remember when George Bush threw up on the Prime Minister?
One of the enemy was at the dinner. He told Bush that he remembered rowing out to capture him. He had to flee when the submarine popped up and shot at them. The man then told Bush that they were stuck on an island and starving and eating captured, fallen soldiers.
Many of our Presidents have fought in battles and wars defending this land, people, and Constitution. Many have also made significant contributions to mankind through the products and services made available because of their industry.
If one should choose his friends the way he would pick apples; shouldn’t he choose the President with the same discretion?
Of the people running for the highest office; who will respect the law? Who will repeal the Affordable Care Act, the parts of the NDAA that allow citizens to be “disappeared”, exiled, and imprisoned indefinitely. Which candidate will restore freedom and liberty by not trying to control every minutiae of your personal and business life?
- Does Nancy Pelosi have dirt on Newt Gingrich? (bazaardaily.com)