May Your Chains Set Lightly Upon You

H. Con. Res. 107: Impeach Obama!

I don’t agree with him on everything, but this man, Representative Walter Jones, is a patriot.

Representative Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012.

It states:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.                                             – Library of Congress

Let’s talk about the Korean “Police Action.” The saying is, those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. I think the saying is wrong because history is going to repeat itself. People study history, and when we try to tell you that it is repeating; you don’t want to take heed. History has already repeated.

Rule  by Secrecy:

Much documentation exists to show that the Korean conflict was the result of careful planning by men whose control extended to both the United States and the Soviet Union. This conflict began with the founding of the United Nations at the end of World War II. The name “United Nations” had been imprinted in the mind of the American public during the war when it referred to the countries allied against Germany, Italy, and Japan…

It was secret protocols at Yalta that agreed to partition Korea along the Thirty-eighth Parallel and allowed the Soviet Union and China control over the North.

Such action had been contemplated a year earlier. An April 1944 article in Foreign Affairs called for “a trusteeship for Korea… assumed not by a particular country, but by a group of Powers, say, the United States, Great Britain, China and Russia.” The CFR leadership realized that the American public might not agree to war should such a “trusteeship” be challenged and began to develop a rationale for intervention.

An internal 1944 CFR memo stated that the “sovereignty fetish” and the “difficulty… arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war” might In- oumim-il willi “the contention treaty would overrule this barrier… our participation in such police action as might be recommended by [an] international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war.”

“It is not unreasonable to say that there never would have been a Communist regime in North Korea, nor would there ever have been a Korean War, had American negotiations [led by CFR members] and lend-lease shipments not brought the USSR into the Pacific theater,” commented Perloff…

Russian commanders were running the conflict on both sides. Under the agreement at Yalta and due to their supplying North Korea with military hardware and technology, Soviet military officers were largely in control of the war. Author Epperson cited a Pentagon press release which identified two Soviet officers as being in charge of movements across the Thirty-eighth Parallel. One, a General Vasilev, actually was overheard giving the order to attack on June 25,1951.

General Vasilev’s chain of command reached from Korea to Moscow to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs. At this same time, General MacArthur’s chain of command went through President Truman to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs, an office held at that time by Russian Constantine Zinchenko. This meant that Soviet officers were overseeing the North Korean war strategy while reporting back to a fellow Soviet officer in the same UN office that coordinated the allied war effort.

“In effect, the Communists were directing both sides of the war,” wrote author Griffin. What past conspiracy authors failed to consider was the evidence that Communist Russia was financed and controlled from the beginning by the inner circle of America’s modern secret societies…

MacArthur, noting that for the first time in its military history, the United States had failed to achieve victory, was later to state, “Never before has this nation been engaged in mortal combat with a hostile power without military objective, without policy other than restrictions governing operations, or indeed without even formally recognizing a state of war.” This set a precedent in the United States which continues to haunt us to this day.

But was there again a hidden purpose to this seemingly pointless conflict, one that reached into the upper circles of the secret societies? A 1952 Foreign Affairs article explained,

“The meaning of our experience in Korea as I see it, is that we have made historic progress toward the establishment of a viable system of collective security.”

So Korea was another step forward in realizing the CFR goals of one-world government backed by a implied military command as with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). CFR member Dean Acheson later admitted, “The only reason I told the President to fight in Korea was to validate NATO.” – Jim Marrs

AUTHORITY TO USE MILITARY FORCE IN LIBYA:

Failure to prevent a slaughter would have disregarded America’s “important strategic interest in preventing Qaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him”…The writ of the United Nations Security Council would have been shown to be little more than empty words, crippling that institution’s future credibility to uphold global peace and security.

The President explained in his March 21, 2011 report to Congress that the use of military force in Libya serves important U.S. interests in preventing instability in the Middle East and preserving the credibility and effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council.

… may justify use of military force by the President. In 2004, for example, we found adequate legal authority for the deployment of U.S. forces to Haiti based on national interests in protecting the lives and property of Americans in the country, preserving “regional stability,” and maintaining the credibility of United Nations Security Council mandates.

… and maintaining the credibility of the UNSC.

In our view, the combination of at least two national interests that the President reasonably determined were at stake here—preserving regional stability and supporting the UNSC’s credibility

The second important national interest implicated here, which reinforces the first, is the longstanding U.S. commitment to maintaining the credibility of the United Nations Security Council and the effectiveness of its actions to promote international peace and security. Since at least the Korean War, the United States government has recognized that “‘[t]he continued existence of the United Nations as an effective international organization is a paramount United States interest.

Here, the UNSC’s credibility and effectiveness as an instrument of global peace and stability were at stake in Libya…

NATO and the UN are controlled by the international bankers who are also our President’s puppet masters.

Watch the whole video here.

Dean Acheson said the only reason we were in Korea was to validate the UN. The word, credibility, appears seven times in the Authority To Use Military Force In Libya paper.

Why isn’t anyone talking about validating the U.S. Constitution, the credibility of the U.S. Congress and it’s legislation?

Barack Obama must have thought that it would be easier to get forgiveness than permission. Just like Panetta said, they started the foreign operation and then told, not asked, Congress what was going on.  Two days after the invasion he said that the UN gave him authority to intervene in Libya.

Barack Obama has committed treason by usurping his powers and congressional authority to international organizations. The United States is an independent nation. We the People are Sovereign.

Impeach Barack Hussein Obama now!

Impeach Leon Panetta!

The precedent has been set. They want to circumvent the authority of the People represented in Congress and now intervene in Syria which will result in Al-Qaeda ruling that nation.

We were paranoid conspiracy theorists when we tried to tell you that the Arab Spring was a false flag operation. We told you that it wasn’t a movement to install democratic republics in the Middle East and North Africa. You didn’t want to believe that we were helping Al-Qaeda take over Egypt and Libya.

Do you want to do the same in Syria? Those who want the New World Order and One-World Government do.

Did you read above about how U.S. soldiers were taking orders from Russian commanders. Do you understand that Al-Qaeda is the CIA? Who is really commanding our soldiers in Afghanistan? If history repeats itself; we are not fighting a real enemy but ourselves to benefit the world’s central banks.

We can not allow one man to have the power to declare war. We can not allow the UN or NATO to supplant our sovereignty.

H. Con. Res. 107 has no co-sponsors. Tell your Representatives to support Walter Jones and co-sponsor this resolution. Tell your Representatives to Impeach the traitors!

If you don’t know who your Representatives are or how to contact them; go to my contact page and give me your zip code. I will tell you who your Representative is and how to contact him or her.

Stand up for our country. Fight for our Independence and Sovereignty.

About these ads

17 responses

  1. Isn’t starting a war without justification/approval one of the worst things a president can possibly do?

    Isn’t this against the Constitution?

    Isn’t the president obliged to follow the Constitution?

    Isn’t all this enough to put Obama out of office?

    What else must happen before a president has to leave office?

    Look at Germany these days. Their former president (Christian Wulff) had to leave because he (allegedly) took some benefits. Not a big deal. Nothing compared to starting a war! But the Germans were able to get rid off Wulff.

    So, when do the American people wake up and force Obama to quit?

    March 9, 2012 at 07:23

    • Yes. It is one of the worst things a President could do. Caeser’s unapproved incursion across the Rubicon led to him becoming the Dictator.
      Is it against the Constitution? Ask Obama. He would know. He taught constitutional law in college.
      Is he obliged to follow the Constitution? I don’t believe that he was ever sworn in. Have you seen the video? If you have please let me know how I may see it too.
      Is it enough to put him out? Yes, but We the People must demand his and Leon Panetta’s impeachment.
      Of course Germany would easily change their regime. From what I know of history; Germany never has put up with BS. I hope they stand up to the Globalist Central Bankers when they start to install the New World Order and International Tyranny. I hope they can find a way out of the EU and the failing Euro currency without starting WWIII.
      When will the Americans wake up? I’m sounding my alarm clock, but it isn’t loud enough. My magazine is about three months old and just reaching 1000 readers. It is shameful that the so-called established, mainstream media is absolutely silent on this news. I haven’t heard a word of this resolution from even the alleged conservative media. They either shit up because they don’t want it to happen or because someone told them to shut up or they’ll get what Breitbart got.
      They can’t wake up if they don’t know that this is happening.

      March 10, 2012 at 01:10

  2. Obama has done NOTHING for America. All of his campaign promises were broken. Obama has killed more innocent civilians, and have taken over more countries than any president ever. He has also passed a bill to take American citizens off the streets, put them in jail for life, without a trial, and he does not have to give you an explanation for doing this.

    March 11, 2012 at 03:46

    • You shouldn’t have said that. Watch the skies overhead for drones following you.

      March 11, 2012 at 17:33

  3. Can’t we just say this “Democracy” thing failed & just give the country back to the Brits? The “Divine Right”, GOD GIVEN, of kings worked for over 1000 years. How could a true Christian not wish to be subject to a king?

    March 11, 2012 at 23:55

    • There are a good number of Youtube conspiracy videos that say America has always been property of Britain. There is one of a littler girl who traced the lineage of all our Presidents except, Van Buren, to one English monarch. Monarchy doesn’t work though. Have you read, Payne’s, Common Sense?

      March 12, 2012 at 12:40

  4. David

    ME THINKS IT MORE THAN A LITTLE STRANGE THAT YOU BRING THIS UP NOW! Where were you when Bush invaded Iraq? Take care of Bush first, then worry about Obama!!!

    Be who you are and say what you feel.
    Those who mind don’t matter;
    those that matter don’t mind.

    March 14, 2012 at 13:19

  5. David

    Your push on this issue reminds me of how the communists took over China … send a “patriot” ahead into the next village to rouse up the other patriots there, and once they were known it was easy to dispose of any resist before entering the village.

    March 14, 2012 at 13:20

    • David, I work for no one. I am an independent citizen journalist. I am delivering the news that the mainstream media doesn’t. I am not a shill or stooge for the Government.
      I am not rousing the patriots for easy pickings. I have exposed myself to be “re-educated” or “disappeared” when the jackboots start marching.
      As for Bush…
      George W. Bush left office January of 2008; four years ago.
      Iraq? Read this, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
      George Bush asked Congress for permission to invade Iraq like he was supposed to. The Iraq War Resolution was passed. In fact, three amendments were proposed having to do with UN involvement or requiring the UN’s authorization. They all failed because this is the United States of America, a Free, Sovereign, Independent nation that is run by We The People.
      I didn’t agree with Iraq either. 9-11 was a false flag operation carried out by Saudi Arabians. Saddam Hussein was taken out for the same reason as Quadaffi. He attempted to circumvent the Central Banking System in regards to what form of money he would accept for payment of oil. Quadaffi wanted to accept only gold, Hussein, Euros instead of the USD.
      You may not have liked the Iraq invasion, but it was legal. Libya was not. The way they want to intervene in Syria is not legal.
      You may not agree with Iraq, but I’m sure you agree with your current standard of living. Do you like having housing, transportation, food, electricity, telecommunications, clothing, health care? Most of these things contain petroleum. They are all produced and delivered to you with petroleum. Fractional banking, Central Banking, and the USD as the Reserve Currency make all these things possible for you. Your standard of living is what was protected in Iraq and Libya. There is not enough gold in the world for everyone. Fiat currency and the Bretton Woods system make it possible for everyone to have money and produce and buy the products they want and need.
      If Bush told you the truth about invading Iraq, you would have said no, and you would have been a hypocrite because the fact that we are communicating via computer tells me that you do not live as the Native American Indians did 200 years ago or as the Amish do now.

      March 14, 2012 at 14:08

  6. A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others. Ayn Rand

    March 20, 2012 at 07:26

  7. If you don’t design your own life plan, chances are you’ll fall into someone else’s plan. And guess what they have planned for you? Not much. Jim Rohn

    March 24, 2012 at 13:26

  8. Pingback: If We’re Losing the Information War, Then Someone Is Winning It « The Freedom Fighter

  9. Pingback: The Case For Impeachment: It Makes Common Sense « The Freedom Fighter

  10. Pingback: The Secret of Power « Fibonacci's "The Secret of Power"

  11. Pingback: the secret of power « JRFibonacci's blog: partnering with reality

  12. Pingback: Secession Petition Mania: Who Wants A Second Civil War? « The Freedom Fighter

  13. Pingback: Duck DieNasty | The Freedom Fighter

Join the debate

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 194 other followers