Representative Walter Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012 and the mainstream media failed to tell you about it.
The resolution accused the president of committing high crimes and misdemeanors; impeachable offenses.
Barack Obama and the defense secretary, Leon Panetta have declared their loyalties to the United Nations and NATO. They will no longer go to Congress for war authorization, but will send our people to war on the orders of foreign entities.
At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Panetta told John Mcain that we need to develop an international consensus to deal with Syria. He said that unilateral action made no sense.
Obama said that helping Syria was best for America’s interest. Why do we need international consensus for our interests?
Panetta told Mcain that he hadn’t done any detailed planning because he was waiting for direction from the president to do that. Mcain then read a Presidential Directive written by Obama. “The prevention of mass atrocities (in Syria) is a core national interest of the United States.”
If it is such a core national interest; why isn’t the nation debating it? Why aren’t the People writing, calling and visiting their Senators and Representatives and voicing their opinions on these matters? Why isn’t the decision to intervene in the Syrian situation being decided by Congress?
Because the President is a U.N. puppet and he will only do what he is told to do by his masters. We the People are not the presidents masters.
“Well let me tell you what’s wrong with your statement. You don’t mention American leadership. Americans should lead in this. Americans should be standing up. Americans should be building coalitions.” – John Mcain to Leon Panetta
But you didn’t see that on the nightly news. You didn’t read that in your newspapers. They did tell you about the false flag operation in Afghanistan that took place right after the Armed Services Committee hearing.
Leon Panetta went to visit the troops and an Afghan man tried to drive a flaming truck into his plane while it landed. They used this incident for a reason to disarm the troops attending Panetta’s speech.
It is not in numbers but in unity, that our great strength lies; yet our present numbers are sufficient to repel the force of all the world. The Continent hath, at this time, the largest body of armed and disciplined men of any power under Heaven… – Common Sense
I find it very strange and unusual for soldiers to not be trusted to be armed in the presence of their commanders, but it makes perfect sense when the commanders know the soldiers realize they are being led by traitors.
Maybe the soldiers understand how they were both fighting and taking orders from the enemy during the Korean Police Action. Maybe they know that al-Qaeda is a wholly owned subsidiary of the CIA.
Maybe Panetta is afraid of a mutiny.
236 years ago Thomas Paine wrote the pamphlet, Common Sense. Paine made arguments against British rule of America that are still relevant today with regards to the U.N.
Much hath been said of the united strength of Britain (U.N.) and the colonies, that in conjunction they might bid defiance to the world. But this is mere presumption; the fate of war is uncertain, neither do the expressions mean anything; for this continent would never suffer itself to be drained of inhabitants to support the British arms in either Asia, Africa, or Europe.
Besides, what have we to do with setting the world at defiance? Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to,will secure us the peace and friendship of all Europe; because it is the interest of all Europe to have America a free port. Her trade will always be a protection, and her barrenness of gold and silver secure her from invaders.
I challenge the warmest advocate for reconciliation, to show, a single advantage that this continent can reap, by being connected with Great Britain (U.N.). I repeat the challenge, not a single advantage is derived. Our corn (iPads, Hollywood entertainment) will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our imported goods must be paid for buy them where we will.
But the injuries and disadvantages we sustain by that connection, are without number; and our duty to mankind I at large, as well as to ourselves, instruct us to renounce the alliance: Because, any submission to, or dependance on Great Britain (U.N./NATO), tends directly to involve this continent in European wars and quarrels; and sets us at variance with nations, who would otherwise seek our friendship, and against whom, we have neither anger nor complaint. As Europe is our market for trade, we ought to form no partial connection with any part of it. It is the true interest of America to steer clear of European contentions, which she never can do, while by her dependance on Britain (U.N.), she is made the make-weight in the scale of British (international) politics.
The authority of Great Britain (U.N.) over this continent, is a form of government, which sooner or later must have an end: And a serious mind can draw no true pleasure by looking forward, under the painful and positive conviction, that what he calls “the present constitution” is merely temporary. As parents, we can have no joy, knowing that this government is not sufficiently lasting to ensure any thing which we may bequeath to posterity: And by a plain method of argument, as we are running the next generation into debt, we ought to do the work of it, otherwise we use them meanly and pitifully. In order to discover the line of our duty rightly, we should take our children in our hand, and fix our station a few years farther into life; that eminence will present a prospect, which a few present fears and prejudices conceal from our sight.
Though I would carefully avoid giving unnecessary offence, yet I am inclined to believe, that all those who espouse the doctrine of reconciliation, may be included within the following descriptions:
Interested men, who are not to be trusted; weak men who cannot see; prejudiced men who will not see; and a certain set of moderate men, who think better of the European world than it deserves; and this last class by an ill-judged deliberation, will be the cause of more calamities to this continent than all the other three. – Common Sense
Do you espouse the U.N., One World Government, Usurpation of Sovereignty doctrine? Which of those descriptions do you fit?
It is not in the power of Britain or of Europe to conquer America, if she do not conquer herself by delay and timidity. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful.
It is repugnant to reason, to the universal order of things, to all examples from the former ages, to suppose, that this continent can longer remain subject to any external power. The most sanguine in Britain does not think so. The utmost stretch of human wisdom cannot, at this time compass a plan short of separation, which can promise the continent even a year’s security. Reconciliation is was a fallacious dream. Nature hath deserted the connection, and Art cannot supply her place. For, as Milton wisely expresses, “never can true reconcilement grow where wounds of deadly hate have pierced so deep.” - Common Sense
The U.N. is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They do not want to help you. What have they done for the Freedom Fighters in Tibet, China, Myanmar, Sudan, Rwanda, South Africa, and Syria?
Their “humanitarian” missions are facades and false flags. They only go into countries where their gold and fiat money, mineral, oil and other natural resource interests are threatened. They make up a boogeyman or foment crises and invade the country in the name of “humanitarianism”.
They ignored Africa’s real problems for years and now they have created Kony and are trying to convince us to support an invasion of Uganda although the Ugandans say Kony has probably been dead for years.
Much of our economy is based on information, electronics and gadgets. Uganda and Africa have the minerals needed for your Apple and Hewlett-Packard products. They believe Africans are too stupid to procure and sell them to us, so the U.N. must take them by force.
Therefore, all countries should implement previous commitments to halt and reverse protectionism and further expand market access, particularly in areas of interest to developing countries. This improvement of market access will be facilitated by appropriate structural adjustment in developed countries. Developing countries should continue the trade-policy reforms and structural adjustment they have undertaken. It is thus urgent to achieve an improvement in market access conditions for commodities, notably through the progressive removal of barriers that restrict imports, particularly from developing countries, of commodity products in primary and processed forms… – Agenda 21
The U.N. is after the sovereignty of your country. The U.N. is after your personal sovereignty and freedom.
Why do they have the Codex Alimenterius? Do you understand that the U.N. feels that you are too stupid to decide what to eat? They feel you are too stupid to decide for yourself what natural herbs, vitamins and minerals you should use for your health?
Already negative trends of the past half century have been accelerated by the recent rules of global trade and finance from global bureaucracies like the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Codex Alimentarius, among others. These institutions have codified policies designed to serve the interests of global agribusiness above all others, while actively undermining the rights of farmers and consumers, as well as the ability of nations to regulate trade across their own borders or to apply standards appropriate to their communities. Rules contained in the Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (of the WTO), for example, have empowered global agricultural corporations to seize much of the world’s seed supply, foods and agricultural lands. The globalization of corporate-friendly patent regimes has also directly undermined indigenous and traditional sui generis rights of farmers, for example, to save seeds and protect indigenous varieties they have developed over millennia.
…All human beings on the planet have a fundamental human right to access and/or to produce sufficient food to sustain their lives and communities. All rules and policies should be aligned to recognize this basic right. Every government—local, regional, national, international—is obliged to guarantee this right. It may not be denied in the interests of international commercial or trade processes, or for any other reason. – Manifesto on the Future of Food
The U.N. doesn’t think so. How can you have access to or produce food without farms? How can you have a farm without land?
“Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for the public can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole… Public control of land use is therefore indispensable to its protection as an asset and the achievement of the long-term objectives of human settlement policies and strategies. - Settlement Planning and Development: A Strategy For Land Policy
The U.N.’s Agenda 21 seeks to eliminate private property. The policies are carried out by local groups and NGO’s under the name of sustainability and other “feel-good” phrases. For example, Michigan is working to eliminate heritage breed pigs, claiming its goal is to eradicate dangerous feral swine, or Executive Order 13575 that establishes the White House Rural Council.
Look for Agenda 21 implementation and indoctrination in your area. Find out if your locality has any ICLEI programs.
The ICLEI is used to carry out Agenda 21 because if they told you what it really was, you would not accept it.
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy – fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear ‘one world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined -the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” – J. Gary Lawrence, Council on Sustainable Development
Everything is fine. Go back to sleep.
Now wake up!
Barack Hussein Obama is the Manchurian Candidate. He cares more about the rest of the world than he does the United States. He and his masters are not loyal to any nation.
We don’t need borders if we don’t have sovereignty. You can’t call someone an illegal alien if they are a citizen of the world. You’re a racist for insisting they learn your language when they live in your country.
Did you hear Obama’s speech in Germany? It sounded like English, but he was really speaking the Globalist, New World Order language.
Where have I heard that global citizenship, national cooperation talk before?
“The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.” -Maurice Strong , Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Can’t you see that Barack Obama does not work for the American people?
“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles and small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the U.N. Earth Summit 1992
Sound familiar? Where else have you heard that statement? Who else do you know, who talks like that?
Are you ready to write some letters and make some phone calls now?
It is time to rid ourselves of treasonous traitors. It is time to withdraw our membership from the U.N. and evict them from their New York City headquarters. The present winter is worth an age if rightly employed, but if lost or neglected, the whole continent will partake of the misfortune; and there is no punishment which that man will not deserve, be he who, or what, or where he will, that may be the means of sacrificing a season so precious and useful. If we don’t reclaim our sovereignty, American life will be like the movie, The Hunger Games.
“AGENDA 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth… Effective execution of AGENDA 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society,unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” – Daniel Sitarz
What do you think that means; an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources?
and is there any man so unwise, as not to see, that (considering what has happened) he will suffer no Law to be made here, but such as suit his purpose? We may be as effectually enslaved by the want of laws in America, as by submitting to laws made for us in England (U.N.). After matters are make up (as it is called) can there be any doubt but the whole power of the crown (Secretary-General) will be exerted, to keep this continent as low and humble as possible? Instead of going forward we shall go backward, or be perpetually quarrelling or ridiculously petitioning. We are already greater than the king (Globalist Elitists) wishes us to be, and will he not hereafter endeavor to make us less? To bring the matter to one point. Is the power who is jealous of our prosperity, a proper power to govern us? Whoever says No to this question is an independent… - Common Sense
Hidden in plain sight are the Georgia Guidestones where the goal of reducing the population from seven to one-half a billion people is chiseled in different languages.
What are you going to do about it? Wake up and realize that this is real and it is really happening now. Ask your parents what life was like before. Compare it to now. Can’t you see the progression of martial law and tyranny?
We used to be able to smoke anywhere. Now some people aren’t allowed to smoke in their homes. Kids used to bring their rifles to school on days their gun clubs met. Now parents get arrested if their kid draws a picture of them with a gun. We used to be able to drive down the street with a beer in hand. Now people get arrested for not wearing a seatbelt. The store used to give us bags to carry our groceries home. Now if your city hasn’t banned them; you must pay a tax for a bag. There used to be water fountains everywhere. Not even the parks in my city have fountains.
Do you remember the good-ol’ days when you had habeus corpus, when you could protest politicians, when you could get on an airplane without people touching your children’s genitals and ogling naked pictures of your wife? Do you remember when you were free to control your own health care?
You must fight it. If you weren’t born into the élite, ruling, banking, globalist class, you will never be one of them. You can’t join them. You can’t appease them. You can’t conciliate. You may feel like you’re in the club. They may make you feel welcome and useful, but trust me; when there’s no one else left, they will eventually kill you too.
Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning- and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of Europe absolute: Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore since nothing but blows will do, for God’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child… – Common Sense
Impeach Obama and Panetta. It makes Common Sense.
O ye that love mankind! Ye that dare oppose, not only the tyranny, but the tyrant, stand forth! Every spot of the old world is overrun with oppression. Freedom hath been hunted round the globe. Asia, and Africa, have long expelled her. Europe regards her like a stranger, and England hath given her warning to depart. O! receive the fugitive, and prepare in time an asylum for mankind.
…To conclude: However strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given, to show, that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration for independence.
… let each of us, hold out to his neighbor the hearty hand of friendship, and unite in drawing a line, which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every former dissention. Let the names of Whig (Republican) and Tory (Democrat) be extinct; and let none other be heard among us, than those of a good citizen, an open and resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the RIGHTS of MANKIND and of the FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES OF AMERICA. – Common Sense
- H. Con. Res. 107: Impeach Obama! (freedomfighterusa.wordpress.com)
I don’t agree with him on everything, but this man, Representative Walter Jones, is a patriot.
Representative Jones introduced H. Con. Res. 107, in the House of Representatives, on March 7, 2012.
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution. – Library of Congress
Let’s talk about the Korean “Police Action.” The saying is, those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. I think the saying is wrong because history is going to repeat itself. People study history, and when we try to tell you that it is repeating; you don’t want to take heed. History has already repeated.
Much documentation exists to show that the Korean conflict was the result of careful planning by men whose control extended to both the United States and the Soviet Union. This conflict began with the founding of the United Nations at the end of World War II. The name “United Nations” had been imprinted in the mind of the American public during the war when it referred to the countries allied against Germany, Italy, and Japan…
It was secret protocols at Yalta that agreed to partition Korea along the Thirty-eighth Parallel and allowed the Soviet Union and China control over the North.
Such action had been contemplated a year earlier. An April 1944 article in Foreign Affairs called for “a trusteeship for Korea… assumed not by a particular country, but by a group of Powers, say, the United States, Great Britain, China and Russia.” The CFR leadership realized that the American public might not agree to war should such a “trusteeship” be challenged and began to develop a rationale for intervention.
An internal 1944 CFR memo stated that the “sovereignty fetish” and the “difficulty… arising from the Constitutional provision that only Congress may declare war” might In- oumim-il willi “the contention treaty would overrule this barrier… our participation in such police action as might be recommended by [an] international security organization need not necessarily be construed as war.”
“It is not unreasonable to say that there never would have been a Communist regime in North Korea, nor would there ever have been a Korean War, had American negotiations [led by CFR members] and lend-lease shipments not brought the USSR into the Pacific theater,” commented Perloff…
Russian commanders were running the conflict on both sides. Under the agreement at Yalta and due to their supplying North Korea with military hardware and technology, Soviet military officers were largely in control of the war. Author Epperson cited a Pentagon press release which identified two Soviet officers as being in charge of movements across the Thirty-eighth Parallel. One, a General Vasilev, actually was overheard giving the order to attack on June 25,1951.
General Vasilev’s chain of command reached from Korea to Moscow to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs. At this same time, General MacArthur’s chain of command went through President Truman to the UN Undersecretary General for Political and Security Council Affairs, an office held at that time by Russian Constantine Zinchenko. This meant that Soviet officers were overseeing the North Korean war strategy while reporting back to a fellow Soviet officer in the same UN office that coordinated the allied war effort.
“In effect, the Communists were directing both sides of the war,” wrote author Griffin. What past conspiracy authors failed to consider was the evidence that Communist Russia was financed and controlled from the beginning by the inner circle of America’s modern secret societies…
MacArthur, noting that for the first time in its military history, the United States had failed to achieve victory, was later to state, “Never before has this nation been engaged in mortal combat with a hostile power without military objective, without policy other than restrictions governing operations, or indeed without even formally recognizing a state of war.” This set a precedent in the United States which continues to haunt us to this day.
But was there again a hidden purpose to this seemingly pointless conflict, one that reached into the upper circles of the secret societies? A 1952 Foreign Affairs article explained,
“The meaning of our experience in Korea as I see it, is that we have made historic progress toward the establishment of a viable system of collective security.”
So Korea was another step forward in realizing the CFR goals of one-world government backed by a implied military command as with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). CFR member Dean Acheson later admitted, “The only reason I told the President to fight in Korea was to validate NATO.” – Jim Marrs
Failure to prevent a slaughter would have disregarded America’s “important strategic interest in preventing Qaddafi from overrunning those who oppose him”…The writ of the United Nations Security Council would have been shown to be little more than empty words, crippling that institution’s future credibility to uphold global peace and security.
The President explained in his March 21, 2011 report to Congress that the use of military force in Libya serves important U.S. interests in preventing instability in the Middle East and preserving the credibility and effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council.
… may justify use of military force by the President. In 2004, for example, we found adequate legal authority for the deployment of U.S. forces to Haiti based on national interests in protecting the lives and property of Americans in the country, preserving “regional stability,” and maintaining the credibility of United Nations Security Council mandates.
… and maintaining the credibility of the UNSC.
In our view, the combination of at least two national interests that the President reasonably determined were at stake here—preserving regional stability and supporting the UNSC’s credibility…
The second important national interest implicated here, which reinforces the first, is the longstanding U.S. commitment to maintaining the credibility of the United Nations Security Council and the effectiveness of its actions to promote international peace and security. Since at least the Korean War, the United States government has recognized that “‘[t]he continued existence of the United Nations as an effective international organization is a paramount United States interest.
Here, the UNSC’s credibility and effectiveness as an instrument of global peace and stability were at stake in Libya…
NATO and the UN are controlled by the international bankers who are also our President’s puppet masters.
Dean Acheson said the only reason we were in Korea was to validate the UN. The word, credibility, appears seven times in the Authority To Use Military Force In Libya paper.
Why isn’t anyone talking about validating the U.S. Constitution, the credibility of the U.S. Congress and it’s legislation?
Barack Obama must have thought that it would be easier to get forgiveness than permission. Just like Panetta said, they started the foreign operation and then told, not asked, Congress what was going on. Two days after the invasion he said that the UN gave him authority to intervene in Libya.
Barack Obama has committed treason by usurping his powers and congressional authority to international organizations. The United States is an independent nation. We the People are Sovereign.
Impeach Barack Hussein Obama now!
Impeach Leon Panetta!
The precedent has been set. They want to circumvent the authority of the People represented in Congress and now intervene in Syria which will result in Al-Qaeda ruling that nation.
We were paranoid conspiracy theorists when we tried to tell you that the Arab Spring was a false flag operation. We told you that it wasn’t a movement to install democratic republics in the Middle East and North Africa. You didn’t want to believe that we were helping Al-Qaeda take over Egypt and Libya.
Do you want to do the same in Syria? Those who want the New World Order and One-World Government do.
Did you read above about how U.S. soldiers were taking orders from Russian commanders. Do you understand that Al-Qaeda is the CIA? Who is really commanding our soldiers in Afghanistan? If history repeats itself; we are not fighting a real enemy but ourselves to benefit the world’s central banks.
We can not allow one man to have the power to declare war. We can not allow the UN or NATO to supplant our sovereignty.
H. Con. Res. 107 has no co-sponsors. Tell your Representatives to support Walter Jones and co-sponsor this resolution. Tell your Representatives to Impeach the traitors!
If you don’t know who your Representatives are or how to contact them; go to my contact page and give me your zip code. I will tell you who your Representative is and how to contact him or her.
Stand up for our country. Fight for our Independence and Sovereignty.